Was on 4chan this morning and noticed a thread where Ana Kasparin was railing on technology that allows porn producers to put other people's faces on porn videos. Of course she was one of the victims of this tech, but it started me thinking about all of it. - This feels like a damage control mechanism. It feels like it may be a way to start the conversation and control the narrative ahead of some shit that might get revealed soon. i.e. "Oh that's not Hillary's face on the woman fucking the 12 year old girl." "They used that new technology." "Oh that's not the senator!" " They put his face on that using that new porn technology!" - Anyway, just wanted to put it out there that it felt wrong. We all know that tech's been out there for a long time, but why is TYT just now raising a stink about it?
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/158688988
view the rest of the comments →
Oh_Well_ian ago
An entire 20 minutes was devoted to this technology before the Oscars last year. I said it was a set up for plausible deniability for Pedogate criminals, BUT..
Are there not digital finger prints on CGI films ?
It's also my understanding that lower grade video is extremely difficult to manipulate or alter.