Reposting : on the HAMPSTEAD CASE, AARON DOVER's mother, Tavistock and Christ Church Primary School (pizzagate)

submitted ago by letsdothis1

Here's the original post which was deleted (I highly recommend the comments section too) : Another look at the Hampstead children's case - Aaron Dover's mother and Christ Church Primary School

 

Adding the needed section to satisfy the rules according to the mods:

@dragonkiller

These two children gave the most bone chilling testimony of being ritually abused and sexually molested in pizzagate history. The two little blonde kids. You will remember their faces instantly probably. Its the Hampstead children. World famous case. Its so relevant he didn't bother with Rule 1.

https://deusnexus.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/hampstead_children.jpg

Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtAuWQHgUvo

Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSJI_qfI-es

Also, Rule 2; Proof that psychotherapist Jenny Dover is the mother :

(Aaron Dover may or may not have been a disinfo agent, I don't know enough about him to have an opinion on that but his mother definitely worked at Tavistock and there does seem to be a connection with the school.)

Rule 3: As I explained in my post, I thought the appointee of this person as the SEND governor a bit odd as he clearly has no background experience for that particular role. He does have a lot of connections to the contemporary art world and to networks that could potentially fit the description of the children's accounts.

I'm still trying to find out who the other governors of the school are.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

It is frustrating for many to have their posts removed.

I understand that, but that doesn't mean they should be allowed to essentially repost them. What's the point of the rules if users can sidestep them by posting a link to their removed submission? I think what I was asking of the submitter was also easy and straight-forward. If users want to vent and raise moderation concerns, they should do it in the appropriate place (i.e. /pizzagatemods), as I always direct them, or in the comments. Linking to the removed post just flouts the rules.

dragonkiller ago

I understand that, but that doesn't mean they should be allowed to essentially repost them.

It does when you violate the rules which you clearly just did.

What's the point of the rules if users can sidestep them by posting a link to their removed submission?

What is the point of the rules if you refuse to follow them? That is abuse of the community.

I think what I was asking of the submitter was also easy and straight-forward.

No it wasn't. You demanded an abnormal level of proof that you do not require on other topics. Prove to me that you require a positive ID on all names on other subjects. You cannot, because you don't.