Here's the original post which was deleted (I highly recommend the comments section too) : Another look at the Hampstead children's case - Aaron Dover's mother and Christ Church Primary School
Adding the needed section to satisfy the rules according to the mods:
@dragonkiller
These two children gave the most bone chilling testimony of being ritually abused and sexually molested in pizzagate history. The two little blonde kids. You will remember their faces instantly probably. Its the Hampstead children. World famous case. Its so relevant he didn't bother with Rule 1.
https://deusnexus.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/hampstead_children.jpg
Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtAuWQHgUvo
Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSJI_qfI-es
Also, Rule 2; Proof that psychotherapist Jenny Dover is the mother :
(Aaron Dover may or may not have been a disinfo agent, I don't know enough about him to have an opinion on that but his mother definitely worked at Tavistock and there does seem to be a connection with the school.)
Rule 3: As I explained in my post, I thought the appointee of this person as the SEND governor a bit odd as he clearly has no background experience for that particular role. He does have a lot of connections to the contemporary art world and to networks that could potentially fit the description of the children's accounts.
I'm still trying to find out who the other governors of the school are.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
Yes, 'allowed.' My role here is to enforce rules decided on by the community. What word would you prefer? Are you really going to police my choice of words? Has everyone here lost their minds?
My job is to decide what "gets to stay" based on whether it meets the rules, so what are you even saying? It seems you're stubbornly trying to avoid acknowledging that allowing users to repost removed submissions allows them to flout the rules. Maybe all this focus on my perfectly appropriate choice of words is actually a bit of projection, because you seem to have abandoned logic in order to posture for dominance.
Throw me under the bus? Again, I pulled the post because he re-linked the removed submission. Stop trying to make it something that it's not. If the community wants to allow users to link deleted submissions, it's fine with me, but it would need to be discussed in a sticky. I think even raising the question would be ridiculous, though, because if users can re-link deleted submissions on the main sub, the rules are nearly pointless. I would probably in fact resign as a mod if that were to be allowed. The shills and trolls would have a field day.
dragonkiller ago
That is what posters have been instructed to do. Modify and repost. This was clearly a good faith effort on OPs part. He didn't post crazy NASA space alien shit so you can just stop using that as an excuse. If you can't tell the difference then you do not need to mod.
The focus is on your dictatorial ACTIONS as a mod. Its what you DO that is abusive. Your snarky language just adds insult to injury.
That is your specialty. Nobody but you is perfect. You do not humbly admit mistakes and correct your actions. You double down and make things worse.