You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

Rule 2: Good on two out of three, but you didn't address this issue of whether we have any evidence that @AaronDover is really Aaron Dover. Again, many people in the original thread suspected it was a disinfo post, and with good reason.

Here's the original post which was deleted (I highly recommend the comments section too)

Rule 4: Since the only thing in the comments is another user (or yourself using another account) complaining about the removal (while trying to equivocate and acting like Rule 1 was cited, I might add), this post violates Rule 4. Mod complaints and discussion of moderation belong on v/pizzagatemods.

letsdothis1 ago

you didn't address this issue of whether we have any evidence that @AaronDover is really Aaron Dover.

I'm not sure what you mean by that as I haven't been following the whole Aaron Dover thing. I just saw 'flat earth' and switched off a long time ago. Could you clarify? As far as I see it, there was an Aaron Dover and his mother is the Tavistock psychotherapist.

Rule 4: Since the only thing in the comments is another user (or yourself using another account) complaining about the removal (while trying to equivocate and acting like Rule 1 was cited, I might add), this post violates Rule 4. Mod complaints and discussion of moderation belong on v/pizzagatemods.

I was referring to the additional information supplied by @dragonkiller and which I then added to my post.

Millennial_Falcon ago

I'm not sure what you mean by that as I haven't been following the whole Aaron Dover thing.

The whole first part of your post was about Aaron Dover. If you want to say "someone claiming to be Aaron Dover" that's fine, but if you want to claim factually that it was really him, you need to give some evidence.

I was referring to the additional information supplied by @dragonkiller and which I then added to my post.

Well just add the info, then. Don't link to a deleted post. Thx.

letsdothis1 ago

I see. I'll make the adjustments and repost tomorrow.

dragonkiller ago

For bullshit posts about politics the threshold of proof is very low and sometimes does not exist. For child abuse posts you have to thread a fucking needle.

Millennial_Falcon ago

We allow significant swamp-related posts, because swamp = pizzagate. Factual claims require sources. Opinions don't. Practical issues of time constraint do however mean that certain posts draw more attention than others. This one drew my attention because a lot of comments in the original post suspected it was disinfo, and because there is a persistent troll who posts almost constantly, and Hampstead, NASA, aliens, and Jack Parsons are some of his favorite subjects.

dragonkiller ago

We allow significant swamp-related posts, because swamp = pizzagate.

Only in the land of the blind.


This one drew my attention because a lot of comments in the original post suspected it was disinfo, and because there is a persistent troll who posts almost constantly, and Hampstead, NASA, aliens, and Jack Parsons are some of his favorite subjects.

The poster that made the post has a solid history. You can say you didn't realize it but nobody would believe it, including me, because you spend too much time here not to be familiar with regular contributors.


Factual claims require sources. Opinions don't.

Anybody that reads this forum knows that you only apply it selectively to your pet peeves of subjects. Swamp posts are of course excluded from your discretion.


You complain about how you are addressed by the community at times. Respect is not freely given, respect is earned. Apparently you are not earning it. Maybe you should consider changing that instead of blaming others.