Here's the original post which was deleted (I highly recommend the comments section too) : Another look at the Hampstead children's case - Aaron Dover's mother and Christ Church Primary School
Adding the needed section to satisfy the rules according to the mods:
@dragonkiller
These two children gave the most bone chilling testimony of being ritually abused and sexually molested in pizzagate history. The two little blonde kids. You will remember their faces instantly probably. Its the Hampstead children. World famous case. Its so relevant he didn't bother with Rule 1.
https://deusnexus.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/hampstead_children.jpg
Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtAuWQHgUvo
Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSJI_qfI-es
Also, Rule 2; Proof that psychotherapist Jenny Dover is the mother :
(Aaron Dover may or may not have been a disinfo agent, I don't know enough about him to have an opinion on that but his mother definitely worked at Tavistock and there does seem to be a connection with the school.)
Rule 3: As I explained in my post, I thought the appointee of this person as the SEND governor a bit odd as he clearly has no background experience for that particular role. He does have a lot of connections to the contemporary art world and to networks that could potentially fit the description of the children's accounts.
I'm still trying to find out who the other governors of the school are.
view the rest of the comments →
dragonkiller ago
He did it again @kevdude. He has set an unusually high bar that he does not think OP can meet. Technically OP did not violate rule 4 because he did not complain, all he did was point to the reason he reposted. But just to let Falcon have that victory that is easily fixed by not doing it again.
Now he is demanding that a victim be identified by positive ID when he knows it would take a birth certificate to meet his demands. We post about people all the time in name only even when we have multiple people with the same name. Then the narrowing process starts and people start ruling out individuals that don't fit the criteria. That is why this is known as a RESEARCH SUB. We want to know if this guy was really a victim or if somebody made it up. It will take several talented people to come up with the answer.
I don't see anything wrong with that because we know Christ Church's history already. We research a lot of Hillary's victims with only a name, and we do it regularly. Why can't we do the same on Christ Church?
@Millennial_Falcon is saying he does not know if Aaron is a victim or not. He needs to prove that Aaron is not a victim or back up out of the way and let us prove it.
@letsdothis1 @vindicator
letsdothis1 ago
And I'm not even saying that Aaron is a victim. I'm simply pointing out the Tavistock connection which is obviously highly significant either way.
dragonkiller ago
Your associations and curiosity are perfectly reasonable. As far as I am concerned the burden of proof should be flipped to Falcon and force him to prove his case. Just because the perps are trying to slander a potential victim is not proof of Falcon's theory. Falcon is supposed to back up and let us investigate but on Christ Church he will fight you. Hillary is an approved safe target because she is heavily protected in D.C. and its open season on her. The people at Christ Church have less protection and are more vulnerable.
@kevdude @Millennial_Falcon @vindicator