You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

dragonkiller ago

INB4 the personal attacks start:

"dragonkiller is just an asshole." Yes I am an asshole. Glad we got that out of the way.

Posts are to be judged by if they met the rules, not if dragonkiller is an asshole. You don't get to be the judge detective Falcon. The post met the rules. And its Christ Church. It is relevant. We know that because you didn't cite Rule 1 but its obviously relevant.

@kevdude @vindicator @Millennial_Falcon

Millennial_Falcon ago

Your post broke some rules. Why not simply fix the problems? Are you just trying to stir up dissent?

dragonkiller ago

@Millennial_Falcon

Christ Church is so relevant that not even you can dispute it. Where does it say in the rules that you have the right to stop the research community from investigating new information. You don't know where it might lead and you already admit that you do not know. Why are you stopping people from investigating new information? Not your job. That is a direct question and I want you to answer it. I just checked the rules again and your name as lead investigator is not in the rules. You don't get to decide which dots can be researched and which ones cannot in a relevant subject when the post meets the rules.

@kevdude @vindicator

dragonkiller ago

I did not post it. I just remember you censoring this topic in the past. I like this topic because its the best case pizzagate has, or so a lot of people think. You did not do the research, you just stopped others from doing it. Not your job. The post met the rules. Research is what we are here for. If the post meets the rules you are not allowed to stop people from trying to connect the dots on new information. That is our job. This is new data in a relevant case. OP wants it investigated. You are hindering.