You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

Rule 3: How was it apparent this guy was connected to a "large network"? I read the article and didn't see anything about that. That also means there's no apparent connection to pizzagate. Not every isolated case of child molestation/porn is relevant to pizzagate. Also, please tell us the content of your pizzagatewhatever link and how it relates to your post(Rule 3). I'm not sure why you posted that in pizzagatewhatever and not here. Also, Rule 4: concerns about moderation should be discussed on /pizzagatemods.

AngB23 ago

Another article re: how this doctor got busted (which I couldn’t get to post here) states “Federal Prosecutors say that the Department of Homeland Security were engaged in a deep cover operation to infiltrate a child pornography distribution website located in India. That unnamed website used a password-protected system that pedophiles could "securely" pay to view or share the illicit images of young children.”

From twat https://mobile.twitter.com/PantherEyez7/status/957419348867538946

So yes...this is part of a network. My Pizzagatewhatever was posted since A) I expected this to be challenged B) this is a NETWORK I examined Paradise Ranch 21 and others similar.

Millennial_Falcon ago

Accessing a website doesn't mean he's part of a network. That's the only basis you have to suggest that? Also, forgot to remove the post. Pls don't repost unless you have other evidence of a network. As for your post on pgwhatever, it is appropriate to post here on the main subverse. Thx.