You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

flashGTX ago

Analysis of Q's posts also reveal some credibility to this theory (not done by me): https://i.imgur.com/FhaLEtQ.png

flashGTX ago

"No other vehicle to regain entry" == no way to get NSA files other than the false alarm (?) "Think BDT" == theres your bulk data transfer reference.

reasonedandinformed ago

Wow. It all aligns:

Q (interpretations in parentheses:

DEFCON 1 [non-nuke FALSE] (incoming missile with alert pushed us to this level, even if not publicly announced) COMMAND? WHY? NECESSARY? NO SUCH AGENCY. (NSA) Where did POTUS stop [post] ASIA? (Hawaii) IT WAS NECESSARY. (we needed the data) FOR GOD & COUNTRY. IT WAS NECESSARY. (repetition here tends, for Q, to imply a coded message. He tried twice? Meaning to IWN? Anyone?) NO OTHER VEHICLE TO REGAIN ENTRY. (had to rely on fail-safe transfer of data, per protocols) :[AGAIN] direct pre-knowledge. (this was a planned op) :[AGAIN] warning ALERT. (by repeating, is there an implication that the same thing happened w/the Japan event? Unclear.) Think BDT. (bulk data transfer)

The REALLY weird thing is that the 12/11 post with fireworks and BDT ALSO applies to this situation. No coincidences. Maybe the 12/12 event was a staged false flag by QAnon and POTUS that served the purpose of confirming Q while also explaining this planned event almost exactly a month later? That is, the "BDT bomber" on 12/12 could have been a POTUS stunt that served the initial purpose and was a misdirection allowing the forewarning of the 1/13 event. Seems crazy...but is it given all we have seen?

User890020 ago

Having the answers side-by-side really helps. Thanks

Narcissism ago

Wasn't Hawaii where Snowdon got his data as a contractor?