Look. She looks and sounds like a libtard that deserved it. You need to include the bit of who she was investigating and how it was deemed a suicide. (or was that just fake shit).
You are going to deserve every down voat you get. Better to pull out now while you are ahead. She was on to the fact that something smelled rotten in Haiti. When she got too close they snuffed her out, like all the others. She sacrificed her life for the truth and You are cheering her death. Sick.
How does that contribute? I appreciate what you do here. But you know people round these parts don't trust Snopes. Reality can't just be a "my sources vs. your sources" thing, can it?
Can you really look at Pizzagate, what it was before it blew up into whatever it is now, from right around the time of the initial Wikileaks, and say that there was not something fucked up going on there?
I'm not asking you to disprove pizzagate. I'm not asking you how burden of proof works. I'm not asking what will hold up in court. I'm just asking, doesn't something look obviously fucked up there?
I'm not saying conspiracy theories are true. I am saying that conspiracy theories jump on the fact that things look fucked up. Not that you should believe a conspiracy theory, but that you recognize something as suspicious enough that it warrants conspiracy theories about it.
I appreciate how you tell people that the decapitated bent-backwards art piece was created before Jeffrey Dahmer. You are providing a defeater, intended to dismiss the guilt-by-association attempt between Podesta and Dahmer. Someone could attempt to defeat your defeater, by showing that Dahmer himself was inspired by the art piece, or by showing that associations between Dahmer and the art piece were already well-known. I haven't seen this attempted.
But there is collaborative work. Providing defeaters.
Just linking to Snopes "lol our sources disagree they are crazy" is unhelpful.
Would you really still be here if you thought pizzagate was simply crazy without any potential for truth?
view the rest of the comments →
wtfeva ago
Look. She looks and sounds like a libtard that deserved it. You need to include the bit of who she was investigating and how it was deemed a suicide. (or was that just fake shit).
carmencita ago
You are going to deserve every down voat you get. Better to pull out now while you are ahead. She was on to the fact that something smelled rotten in Haiti. When she got too close they snuffed her out, like all the others. She sacrificed her life for the truth and You are cheering her death. Sick.
Are_we_sure ago
Oh look the flames of craziness, two different kinds.
https://us-east-1.tchyn.io/snopes-production/uploads/2016/11/human-trafficking-center.jpg?w=527
antiracist ago
How does that contribute? I appreciate what you do here. But you know people round these parts don't trust Snopes. Reality can't just be a "my sources vs. your sources" thing, can it?
Can you really look at Pizzagate, what it was before it blew up into whatever it is now, from right around the time of the initial Wikileaks, and say that there was not something fucked up going on there?
I'm not asking you to disprove pizzagate. I'm not asking you how burden of proof works. I'm not asking what will hold up in court. I'm just asking, doesn't something look obviously fucked up there?
@eagleshigh @bojangles @sarmegahhikkitha
I'm not saying conspiracy theories are true. I am saying that conspiracy theories jump on the fact that things look fucked up. Not that you should believe a conspiracy theory, but that you recognize something as suspicious enough that it warrants conspiracy theories about it.
I appreciate how you tell people that the decapitated bent-backwards art piece was created before Jeffrey Dahmer. You are providing a defeater, intended to dismiss the guilt-by-association attempt between Podesta and Dahmer. Someone could attempt to defeat your defeater, by showing that Dahmer himself was inspired by the art piece, or by showing that associations between Dahmer and the art piece were already well-known. I haven't seen this attempted.
But there is collaborative work. Providing defeaters.
Just linking to Snopes "lol our sources disagree they are crazy" is unhelpful.
Would you really still be here if you thought pizzagate was simply crazy without any potential for truth?
Are_we_sure ago
Did you see the image? I was linking to the response of the people who knew her.