Headline: Leah Remini defends fellow ex-Scientologist Paul Haggis, suggests Church of Scientology is behind rape claims
Summary: Paul Haggis is a former Scientologist who left the church in 2009. He is being accused of rape and sexual assault by a publicist named Haleigh Breest, who works interestingly enough for the Child Mind Institute. Leah now claims, “We expect the next ‘revelations’ about Paul Haggis in this campaign to destroy him to be based on information culled from his Scientology files in the form of more ‘anonymous’ accusers..."
Commentary: For those who haven't followed the Haggis narrative, he has many connection points to PIZZAGATE -- see some of the links posted below. He is obviously linked to this mess, but to what end, and on what side?
Previous Voat Threads On Haggis:
If the allegations against Haggis are false, the question is why attack him? And why is it the Clinton-backed Child Mind Institute is the main source of ammo behind the attack? What does he know and what are they afraid he will share?
view the rest of the comments →
GreenDell144 ago
Operators in a cult are often brownstoned as a control. It is unlikely that someone would try to expose the crimes if they are being blackmailed. So, logic dictates that Paul Haggis is not guilty of the accusations against him, and he is being targeted because he was trying to expose something. Either that, or he is a brain damaged victim of the cult, firing short circuit signals like Corey Feldman.
HugoWeaving ago
That is what I was leaning towards as well. Interestingly enough, Haggis even pushes the Feldman narrative:
On pedophilia and sexual abuse in Hollywood:
See what he does there? "I am sure" (taking the stance of an expert) that "allegations in the past" (not facts, and not current) which "no one took seriously" (ergo, if you're some one than you too wouldn't take them seriously) are worth considering too...
Controlled Opposition then?