Not saying it was right but he may have been under pressure from Pam Bondi, and not sure about the time frame but Jeb Bush was also at the helm when children turned up missing from dcf. So he may have just been following orders from above.
I would take it much further, and suggest that any time you have these figures like Epstein that play major roles in the bigger corrupt power structure, it should be assumed by default that legal proceedings against them will be controlled, and that people will have their hands tied at all levels in those proceedings. We all know that the supposed official impartiality of judicial process isn't a reality-- so why can we pretend to take it for granted that Acosta would have been throwing the book at Epstein? And then in turn use that to push the anti-Trump agenda, which we all know is identical to the pro-pedo agenda? There is no way he could have been. If he decided to fight the power, he would have lost, and died. So enough of this game shills play. We know we are dealing with the most powerful people in the world, we know that good and bad people at every level are all stuck within the evil system the top elites control. So ANY argument based on phony mainstream assumptions we know are false, like in this thread, should be ruled out, IMO.
view the rest of the comments →
Gothamgirl ago
Not saying it was right but he may have been under pressure from Pam Bondi, and not sure about the time frame but Jeb Bush was also at the helm when children turned up missing from dcf. So he may have just been following orders from above.
AdmirableNelson ago
I would take it much further, and suggest that any time you have these figures like Epstein that play major roles in the bigger corrupt power structure, it should be assumed by default that legal proceedings against them will be controlled, and that people will have their hands tied at all levels in those proceedings. We all know that the supposed official impartiality of judicial process isn't a reality-- so why can we pretend to take it for granted that Acosta would have been throwing the book at Epstein? And then in turn use that to push the anti-Trump agenda, which we all know is identical to the pro-pedo agenda? There is no way he could have been. If he decided to fight the power, he would have lost, and died. So enough of this game shills play. We know we are dealing with the most powerful people in the world, we know that good and bad people at every level are all stuck within the evil system the top elites control. So ANY argument based on phony mainstream assumptions we know are false, like in this thread, should be ruled out, IMO.
Gothamgirl ago
Thank you for sharing. I had first hand experience being stone walled by one of the individuals I named, but unrelated to Pizzagate.