When unsealed, all those indictments will require prosecutors. And so it makes sense that on Jan. 3, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed 17 current and former federal prosecutors as interim U.S. attorneys.
It's true that Sessions made some appointments, but has nothing whatsoever to do with these indictments. They have left this positions unfilled and you can only have an "Acting" US Attorney for 300 days and they were about to hit this deadline and that is why they made these appointments, Any of the sealed indictments could have been prosecuting by an "acting" US Attorney, so the claim is laughable.
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
lol. Wow that is funny.
icuntstopswearing ago
But true..
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-sessions-appoints-17-current-and-former-federal-prosecutors-interim-united
Are_we_sure ago
No. It's not.
It's true that Sessions made some appointments, but has nothing whatsoever to do with these indictments. They have left this positions unfilled and you can only have an "Acting" US Attorney for 300 days and they were about to hit this deadline and that is why they made these appointments, Any of the sealed indictments could have been prosecuting by an "acting" US Attorney, so the claim is laughable.