You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

argosciv ago

someonesbones article archived: http://archive.is/LftP6

Villa Rak Tawan does indeed overlook Surin Beach, Thailand - to find on google maps, look up the next villa over; Villa Chan Grajang.

@new4now mentions that Villa Rak Tawan:

is rented out for weddings and other special occasions.

@SebuttYopick mentions:

Thailand also has a jihad islamist population like Philippines

From someonesbones arcticle:

According to our source, the Trump administration learned that Obama, by proxy, owned a mansion and a 400-acre estate on the outskirts of the city of Si Sa Ket, approximately 500 km from Bangkok. On paper, the land was owned by the allegedly defunct Solyndra Corporation, a startup solar company to which Obama gave 2.2 billion taxpayer dollars in 2009. Shortly thereafter, Solyndra declared bankruptcy, and the money vanished. Despite apparent poverty, Solyndra maintained real estate holdings valued at over 800 million dollars in a half-dozen Southeast Asian countries. The Trump administration connected the dots, linking Obama to the Thai property, after asserting Presidential privilege and subpoenaing flight records that demonstrably proved Obama had travelled to Si Sa Ket six times as president and an additional four times in the past year.

In a June 2009 edition of the Washington Beacon, conservative author Thomas Clearwater wrote, “Solyndra does not appear to be a legitimate institution, and is likely a shell company or slush fund used or owned by Obama to launder his dirty money.”

Solyndra is(was) real and so is(was) Obama's financial support for it and it's subsequent bankruptcy...

Solyndra

Solyndra was a manufacturer of cylindrical panels of copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells based in Fremont, California. Although the company was once touted for its unusual technology, plummeting silicon prices led to the company's being unable to compete with conventional solar panels made of crystalline silicon.[1] The company filed for bankruptcy on September 1, 2011.[2][3]

Government support

Solyndra received a $535 million U.S. Energy Department loan guarantee, the first recipient of a loan guarantee under President Barack Obama's economic stimulus program, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.[16] Additionally, Solyndra received a $25.1 million tax break from California's Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority.[17]

Following the bankruptcy, the government was expected to recoup $27 million under the Solyndra restructuring plan, or up to 100% of loaned funds from a $1.5 billion lawsuit filed against Chinese solar-panel makers for alleged price fixing.[2] The outcome of the lawsuits were that, in November 2015, Yingli Green Energy Holding Co Ltd. settled a claim filed by Solyndra for $7.5 million, and in April 2016 Trina Solar Ltd. settled a claim filed by Solyndra for $45 million. As of April 2016, Solyndra's suit against Suntech Power Holdings Co Ltd. has not yet settled.[18]

Are we looking at a coded message? A distress call? A call to dig further?

@Vindicator @Gothamgirl @EricKaliberhall

JimmyLionstar1 ago

Interesting.. i looked in to Solyndra. Found that Washington Post wrote an articel about this scandal in late 2011. It was written by an award wining journalist Joe Stephens https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Stephens_(journalist) This article was a highligted work of him for the WP, and now it is now scrubbed from WP. At least for me..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/specialreports/solyndra-scandal/

But you can read it at the wayback machine.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170630181359/http://www.washingtonpost.com/solyndra-politics-infused-obama-energy-programs/2011/12/14/gIQA4HllHP_story.html?utm_term=.d3a8027130a6

"it tells story about strange and probably corrupted ways how they got the loans. and the cover up of the failing of the company for political purposes for Obama and the democrats in the mid terms."

Nice post.. @argosciv

Edit: Found WP link to article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/solyndra-politics-infused-obama-energy-programs/2011/12/14/gIQA4HllHP_story.html

argosciv ago

Nice post..

Right back at ya! :)

Interestingly enough, from my end, webarchive says that url isn't saved...

GOT IT: https://www.washingtonpost.com/solyndra-politics-infused-obama-energy-programs/2011/12/14/gIQA4HllHP_story.html?utm_term=.65d982c53ea6 | http://archive.is/8z9ak

Article opens: (links are also via archive.is; safe to click)

image

Since the failure of Solyndra, Obama’s entire $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability for an administration about to enter a bruising reelection campaign. (Bill O'Leary/WASHINGTON POST)

By Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig December 25, 2011

Linda Sterio remembers the excitement when President Obama arrived at Solyndra last year and described how his administration’s financial support for the plant was helping create hundreds of jobs. The company’s prospects appeared unlimited as Solyndra executives described the backlog of orders for its solar panels.

Then came the August morning when Sterio heard a newscaster announce that more than a thousand Solyndra employees were out of work. Only recently did she learn that, within the Obama administration, the company’s potential collapse had long been discussed.

“It’s not about the people; it’s politics,” said Sterio, who remains jobless and at risk of losing her home. “We all feel betrayed.”

Since the failure of the company, Obama’s entire $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability for an administration about to enter a bruising reelection campaign.

Meant to create jobs and cut reliance on foreign oil, Obama’s green-technology program was infused with politics at every level, The Washington Post found in an analysis of thousands of memos, company records and internal ­e-mails. Political considerations were raised repeatedly by company investors, Energy Department bureaucrats and White House officials.

The records, some previously unreported, show that when warned that financial disaster might lie ahead, the administration remained steadfast in its support for Solyndra.

Much more in article, shortened for quick reading here.

@Vindicator @Gothamgirl @carmencita @Factfinder2 @followthemoney

Factfinder2 ago

See my comment to OP.

argosciv ago

^ @EricKaliberhall you might be interested in this too :)

new4now ago

Was reading up on Solyndra

Sounds fishy

Tomorrow gonna go through Snopes points

See if I can find yea or nay stuff on story

Limpness ago

I think it might be something to it. Wind farms are a huge heist on unknowing Americans. They only produce about 20% of the power they promise. There was one built close to my house in upper state ME. The corporation , First Wind, was pretty much owned by two hedge funds. Rahm Emmanuel had a big stake in one..Larry Summers the other. Summers was even marketing director while working under Obama. The banks financing them were among the world's dirtiest. Citibank, Deutsche, Credit Suisse..One was built , another planned but there was no money. The planned one was built for millions by Obama's jobs program. After the building , there were about 6 jobs there at the wind farm. Each one cost millions...Rahm and Larry made off like bandits.Cap and Trade was never passed into law by congress. But New England had it . The money is in the renewable energy credits. No energy has to be produced. Because this wind farm was an eye opener to me about the democrats and wind energy...I can see them doing the exact same thing with solar.

new4now ago

Thonk Trump but a stop to money for green energy for a reason

It was a way to funnel money to their own pocket

I agree we should look at it, the fact Snopes calls it fake, I would say diffently needs more looking

DeathToMasonsASAP ago

Yes, go to Snopes. I hear they have the answers.

new4now ago

They are the Miss Cleo of the liberals

Call Now, we have the answer

Psychic network that used to do commercials

new4now ago

That they do, if they say it's not true it's debunked , it's the bible for a lot of people that like to farm.

They all voted for Hillary too

See what you want, done explaining the why I put it up

Debunk the debunker

Snopes and the people who use it is one of the reasons I quit facebook

argosciv ago

well, if snopes want's to stick with the Nibiru talking point, there's this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune#Subsequently_proposed_trans-Neptunian_planets

new4now ago

Is that the planet with the huge eliptical path around earth?

I haven't looked much into the alien thing, but have seen enough that I'm at least on the fence about it

argosciv ago

Around the sun, very far outside the orbit of neptune, there's several "trans-neptunian objects", which is the category Nibiru/Planet-X and Planet-9 would fit into, if real. Doesn't necessarily mean anything about aliens, just planets :)

new4now ago

had a friend that didn't talk about anything but ET's

cant say no to it but no yet believing

wish he was still around, all this talk he would have been so geeked