The fact that Amazon was allowed to operate and grow for 20 years without needing to show a profit should be reason for suspicion. The intended function is to totally dominated and subjugate as much online sales/ sellers as possible.
That's been my point all along. Who the hell funded Bezos? Whose deep pockets were allowing Amazon to hemorrhage money all that time without complaining? Everything had to have been planned and Amazon was no normal entrepreneurial venture. Business owners needed to turn a profit. Normally, there's a bit of a cushion, but twenty years? Without Bezos panicking? Without investors panicking? No way.
view the rest of the comments →
Narcissism ago
The fact that Amazon was allowed to operate and grow for 20 years without needing to show a profit should be reason for suspicion. The intended function is to totally dominated and subjugate as much online sales/ sellers as possible.
migratorypatterns ago
That's been my point all along. Who the hell funded Bezos? Whose deep pockets were allowing Amazon to hemorrhage money all that time without complaining? Everything had to have been planned and Amazon was no normal entrepreneurial venture. Business owners needed to turn a profit. Normally, there's a bit of a cushion, but twenty years? Without Bezos panicking? Without investors panicking? No way.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
That is exactly it. Tesla is the same.