You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

13Buddha ago

Words, words, words and on and on it goes. Hoping, hoping, hoping and on and on it goes. Lies, lies, lies and on and on it goes. Praying, praying, praying and on and on it goes.

We need a miracle. Tis the season.

Merry Christmas.

Random101 ago

"We need" isn't going to get you one - arguments based on necessity are the basis of lawlessness. The legal doctrine of the state of emergency originated with the Roman justitium.

Illud quod alias licitum non est necessitas facit licitum, et necessitas inducit privilegium quod jure privatur. That which is not otherwise permitted, necessity allows, and necessity makes a privilege which supersedes the law. 10 Co. 61.

https://thelawdictionary.org/justitium/

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0063:entry=justitium-cn

mrfetus ago

This isn't coherent, are you a bot?

Random101 ago

Not a bot. "we need" implies necessity, and necessity is inconsistent with miracles because miracles happen according to natural law and necessity doesn't have any causal basis at law. The doctrine of necessity originated with Roman law, which doesn't have a foundation in natural law.

BIGLY17 ago

Just because you throw Latin into the mix does not make your “logic” statement any less flawed/skewed. While I may agree with the underlying concept you’re attempting to relay, I disagree w/the absolute terms in which you’ve chosen to phrase it.

Random101 ago

Just because you throw Latin into the mix does not make your “logic” statement any less flawed/skewed.

You haven't identified any flaw or skew.