You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

argosciv ago

Jesus fucking Christ... what a load of utter horseshit, I dunno where you got this drivel, but just no.

As much as you're entitled to your conclusions/opinions, I'm gonna go ahead an express my own, again, this is utter nonsense.

migratorypatterns ago

Not sure what you're talking about.

I gave the links to the drivel.

This is a classic example of why the Cannibal Elite use star power. People are so enamored with these people who possess this X factor that all logic falls by the wayside. But on the other hand, I know the feeling. I had to be redpilled, but I will never turn my back on evidence again. I won't necessarily believe everything, mind you, but it'll stay archived in my brain for later use.

So I get your rejecting everything. You idolize him ... it's impossible ... yada yada yada. But at the end of the day, there's that baby in the pool.

There are no coincidences.

argosciv ago

Idolize him? meh, I rarely listen to Nirvana. Rejecting everything? Lol no, not even remtoely accurate - I just wholeheartedly reject any accusations that Kurt was a pedo. We don't have to argue about it, I'm in no mood to do so - I am confident enough in my own research, to flat out call this bullshit and move on, without it being a matter of idolization or rejecting something which you think I can't handle.

If a baby in a pool is what you want to focus on, that's your prerogative. I mean no offense or hostility towards you, but, again, this is bullshit.

2impendingdoom ago

Baby in a pool with money, CIA, geffen, drugs, pg wife, crappy bands, suspicious death, its a convergence zone of everything we've been digging in.

argosciv ago

Oh I get that, really I do. I've often pinged you to my research, I've no beef with you :)

Honestly though, I'm still sitting here saying that I have no reason to believe Kurt was a pedophile or an enabler thereof. I have my reasons and research, which many are incidentally attacking on an ad hominem basis - typical and even a little ironic given the subject matter, but, oh well... still plenty more to come and the petty efforts against me are of no major concern.

2impendingdoom ago

its not against you, but the evidence that MP has presented doesn't warrant attacking her post. I think her evidence is compelling.

argosciv ago

/shrug

I meant no personal attack, just a conflict of opinion based on previous and ongoing research. Others are definitely trying to target me, though. I dunno if that necessarily includes MP, but she(?) has decided I must be a shill, which is a shame, but, 'tis what it is...