Yes, but this is exactly how confirmation bias works. As I have asked others, what is your most compelling piece of evidence that makes this true? Its a serious question from a serious person. I think you are overstating how hard it would be to fake it.
I understand it's a big body of stuff, which I can't invest the time into. So I am taking a shortcut. Help me understand why I should believe this, because I read people saying the Atlanta airport is being shut down for extractions, nutty stuff like that.
You either care enough to read and examine it all on your own or you don't. I don't have time to follow every day either, but I find at least an hour or two a week to catch up, usually more. You're spending time arguing with people about their proof that made it real for them after they spent lots of time investigating for themselves. You're not getting all the little pieces that were falling into place to make that decision before they were finally convinced with the one that clicked the bigger picture in their head, if that makes any sense.
Either you are interested in reducing the following of Q or you want to be "in" on it without actually doing the foot work yourself. Neither is a good stance. Can honestly say this is a pretty shill like post.
view the rest of the comments →
Oh_Well_ian ago
dubunk the evidence or shut the fuck up
oresd ago
Yes, but this is exactly how confirmation bias works. As I have asked others, what is your most compelling piece of evidence that makes this true? Its a serious question from a serious person. I think you are overstating how hard it would be to fake it.
I understand it's a big body of stuff, which I can't invest the time into. So I am taking a shortcut. Help me understand why I should believe this, because I read people saying the Atlanta airport is being shut down for extractions, nutty stuff like that.
Warnos44 ago
You either care enough to read and examine it all on your own or you don't. I don't have time to follow every day either, but I find at least an hour or two a week to catch up, usually more. You're spending time arguing with people about their proof that made it real for them after they spent lots of time investigating for themselves. You're not getting all the little pieces that were falling into place to make that decision before they were finally convinced with the one that clicked the bigger picture in their head, if that makes any sense.
Either you are interested in reducing the following of Q or you want to be "in" on it without actually doing the foot work yourself. Neither is a good stance. Can honestly say this is a pretty shill like post.