Was doing some research and came across this article about this creepy dude who was just arrested in Anchorage, Alaska on child porn charges. And whoa, that city apparently has a LOT of people who do not put up with that shit. There are over 100 comments already and many are very vocal about exactly how they think that pedo should be treated.
This is an opportunity to red pill some very pissed off people who might want to join our ranks. Join in the comments and sound off to let them know that child sex trafficking and CP are huge problems. You don't even have to mention Pizzagate if you're concerned about getting doxed.
Child porn arrest; APD concerned about potential victims
Anchorage Police are concerned there may be local child victims after arresting a man who owned a van with blacked-out windows and finding a document on his computer about "hunting/stalking kids and the pedophile handbook".
An Anchorage man was arrested on outstanding warrants late Tuesday night, authorities say, related to child porn possession and distribution.
Anchorage Police spokesperson MJ Thim said 27-year-old Cody Cogley was arrested at 10:30 p.m. in the 300 block of 104th Avenue for outstanding warrants for distribution of child porn, possession of child porn, forgery and theft. He was also charged with resisting arrest.
Thim said the investigation started October 30 when Cogley sent "child sexual exploitation videos" to an undercover detective with APD's Cyber Crimes Unit. The Alaska Internet Crimes Against Children task force, Alaska State Troopers and the FBI served a search warrant for Cogley's home and found evidence of the crimes on his computer and other digital devices.
In the criminal complaint filed Tuesday, detectives noted finding a document on Cogley's computer about "hunting/stalking kids", as well as a "pedophile handbook". Cogley told investigators that documents were included in a "pack" download.
Thim says the documents outlined how to hunt for children-- where to find them, what ages to look for. Cogley's van had the windows blacked-out and all but the front seats removed, Thim says, and investigators found evidence that Cogley intended to buy a bed for the van.
Either police prevented what could be a serious crime, Thim says, or there are victims out there. Thim says there's no evidence there are victims, but after putting together all of the evidence, it appears there was intent on Cogley's part.
Now, police are putting pictures of Cogley and his van out to the public in case there are indeed victims out there.
At his bail hearing, Cogley was appointed a public defender. He was given a $100,000 cash appearance bond and a $10,000 performance bond. He's also required to have a third-party custodian, should he make bail.
Cogley is charged with three counts of distribution of child porn, three counts of possession of child porn, one count of forgery and one count of theft. He faces a maximum of 99 years for each of the first six counts. The forgery charge stems from counterfeit $20 bills found during a search of his home, according to the criminal complaint.
view the rest of the comments →
neurotica ago
Taxpayers pay to keep these sick, broken fucks in protective custody, and then eventually release these incurable sexual predators after they've 'served their time'. This isn't a normal situation where constitutional rights fully apply, these 'people' who violently sexually abuse children need to be adjucated as a special case somehow, like enemy combatants or war criminals.
Who among us has a problem with locking these child rapists up for life after a fair trial by a jury of their peers? False accusations should be no problem, we can just do DNA tests. It's a great time to be alive, we have a chance to really do right by these victims for once, why are we dropping the ball so often and letting people walk?
The guy in this article will probably be walking the streets someday, maybe even someday soon. And what?
Deflo56 ago
I was once part of a jury pool that was being selected to retain a serial child rapist past his sentence. I was rejected by his lawyer because I thought some people did not have “free will” to reject their pathological desires.
AgainstPedos ago
If they don't have the "free will" to reject their pathological desires, then why didn't they volunteer to spend the rest of their lives in a mental hospital and in isolation? Would that be an adequate excuse for someone who supposedly cannot control his overwhelming desire to possess all of the super expensive jewelry in another's retail store despite his unwillingness to earn a living?
Deflo56 ago
The lawyer was trying to select a jury that thought a person through his free will could overcome his desires. He was wanting this guy to go free. He said “ I’m sure you all believe in free will”. I raised my hand and said “I don’t think so”. Anyway I wasn’t picked and I hope I ruined his defense strategy. I looked in the papers and I’m not sure of the outcome. This was before the internet.