You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

neurotica ago

Taxpayers pay to keep these sick, broken fucks in protective custody, and then eventually release these incurable sexual predators after they've 'served their time'. This isn't a normal situation where constitutional rights fully apply, these 'people' who violently sexually abuse children need to be adjucated as a special case somehow, like enemy combatants or war criminals.

Who among us has a problem with locking these child rapists up for life after a fair trial by a jury of their peers? False accusations should be no problem, we can just do DNA tests. It's a great time to be alive, we have a chance to really do right by these victims for once, why are we dropping the ball so often and letting people walk?

The guy in this article will probably be walking the streets someday, maybe even someday soon. And what?

Deflo56 ago

I was once part of a jury pool that was being selected to retain a serial child rapist past his sentence. I was rejected by his lawyer because I thought some people did not have “free will” to reject their pathological desires.

mooteensy ago

I wonder what the final decision was on the serial child rapist...thanks for the insight!