You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Arrvee ago

I have a problem with both of the Soros extraction and thwarted bomb attack theories. If someone of Soros's importance were arrested in a secret operation without due process of law, someone would be screaming about it. Democrats would be screaming fascism, Republicans would be screaming "We got him."

There is no need for the blackout, to inconvenience thousands of people and cause economic damage, if all the feds wanted to do was arrest people. They could call up the air marshalls and they would put two men on theplane and take Soros off.

If the blackout was a thwarted terrorist attack (as went another theory), that does not fit well with the arrest theory. It seems unlikely to have both going on at the same time.

Did we ever confirm that the fire started under Concourse F or near terminal 5? That was speculated and suddenly became "verified" with no evidence.

Vindicator ago

Excellent points, Arrvee. Not sure why you are assuming any arrests would happen "without due process of law". Arrests can be due process without publicity. In fact, one would expect it if publicity would compromise other arrests yet pending.

DeathToMasonsASAP ago

Nonsense as always. I suppose you will sell us that they will have secret arrest, secret trials and secret imprisonment and we are supposed to be cheering this imaginary war. Give it up. How are the kids?

Dressage2 ago

Think Nuremberg 2.0, shill.