Early this morning in CBTS general thread 104, someone posted a photo of Anderson Cooper. Q said to look closely at the papers on the table:
Saw this in last thread.
Focus on papers on table.
Graphic at top.
They all belong to the same sick cult/club.
Q
First people thought the letterhead was 'GANNETT' then most decided it wasn't. There seems to be a leather rabbit mask on upper left and a hooded person at upper right.
The best res found to date has been stored here: Anderson Coopers Papers
Curious as to the logo.
view the rest of the comments →
e-traiu ago
And the kid sexdoll in the background is only visible in my timeline? Wtf
anotherdream ago
lol Right?!?! That's Honey Boo Boo Child. - LMAO WTF ?
Arrvee ago
Either it's meaningful or it's meaningless. If it is meaningful, then it establishes a relationship between Cooper and something else.
Whoever took the photograph may have wanted Honey Boo Boo in the shot. Perhaps it's a marketing stunt and Cooper is in on it. That would have been a huge scandal 30 years ago, but so many people in the media today are sellouts that people would shrug at it.
Honey Boo Boo is a spinoff of Toddlers and Tiaras that ran on The Learning Channel. TLC is owned by Discovery Communications, owners of the Discovery Channel. I have not found a relatinoship between Gannett and Discovery. The show was cancelled abruptly when Mama June had a relationship with a convicted sex offender. That is salacious but it doesn't mean anything about Cooper.
neurotica ago
I noticed two things in one of the links you provided. Now I'm not sure if this was just bad writing or if this article was trying to say something without actually saying it. I'm sure it's the former, or at least I hope so, for all our sakes.
http://www.etonline.com/tv/153003_here_comes_honey_boo_boo_canceled
Notice her distancing language in these excerpts, instead of definitely declaring that she wants nothing to do with the sex offender, she says she 'does not seem to want to' see 'that person'. Lots of weasel words packed into a tiny space, if you ask me.
And then this faintly horrifying Freudian slip from the same article, farther down the page:
Uh-huh. I don't want to know the things they wouldn't normally have had to do. Those poor kids.
anotherdream ago
Great perspective!