Relevance: This is relevant to pizzagate for two reasons: (1) The victory of Doug Jones now paves the way for a Democratic Senate Majority. (2) This all ties to Planned Parenthood and selling baby parts. Roy Moore was an adamant opponent of abortion; Jones is not. Moore would be pro-Trump; Jones is not. Planned Parenthood has just pleaded guilty to selling baby parts, and is already protected from undercover investigative journalists in California thanks to Jerry Brown making it a crime to film them. And Al Franken's replacement has just been named and it's Tina Miller, abortion lobbyist and former VP OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD. Planned Parenthood has been featured many times in the pizzagate forum. "Baby body parts must flow," is the new rule of law, and the Cannibal Elite are doing everything to make that happen. First, smearing Moore with what appear to be fake sexual assault claims, then with over 230,000 more democratic votes than in the mid-term election, and now this: DESTROYING VOTING RECORDS SO THERE CAN'T BE AN ACCURATE RECOUNT.
https://twitter.com/TiaCarra/status/940879442024501249
Want to know how the Alabama election is going? The state attorney just filed an emergency motion to make sure they could continue to destroy electronic ballot records. You can’t make this stuff up.
No, you sure can't. And here I thought Jones winning had to do with the smug ignoramus Charles Barkley's endorsement, but that's me.
I really ddn't believe there were irregularities in the election. I figured the smear tactics won out, but then I saw a tweet giving the outrageous number of dem voters this time around ... and now this. Why would a court think it in the best interest of Alabama to destroy records? Why?
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/in_final-hour_order_court_rule.html
In final-hour order, court rules that Alabama can destroy digital voting records after all
Alabama is allowed to destroy digital voting records created at the polls during today's U.S. Senate election after all.
At 1:36 p.m. Monday, a Montgomery County Circuit Court judge issued an order directing Alabama election officials to preserve all digital ballot images created at polling places across the state today.
But at 4:32 p.m. Monday, attorneys for Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill and Ed Packard, the state administrator of elections, filed an "emergency motion to stay" that order, which the state Supreme Court granted minutes after Merrill and Packard's motion was filed.
By granting the stay, the court effectively told the state that it does not in fact have to preserve the digital ballot images - essentially digitized versions of the paper ballots voters fill out at the voting booth - created today.
The court will hold a hearing on Dec. 21 about whether to dismiss the case outright. By that point the state will have had ample time to destroy the digital ballot images legally under the stay.
view the rest of the comments →
cal14 ago
I'm hearing that Roy Moore has not conceded defeat.
And a recount is possible.
Now this is heresay. But I think it is true.
migratorypatterns ago
No, you're right. I read it. He hasn't conceded which makes this all the more unbelievable.
There is NO GOOD REASON that any judge would rule in favor of destroying voting records. NONE.
cal14 ago
In the state of Alabama,a recount is automatic if the final vote
count differs by at least one half of one percent. If it doesn't the contesting party
(in this case Roy Moore) would have to pay for a recount.
At least, that's my understanding.
migratorypatterns ago
No, the amount is three times that so it doesn't qualify for an automatic recount.
They figured out all the angles on this one.