I'll start from the top, where suspicions had arisen. Bill Mitchell tweets this out after the results come in:
Ok guys, strangest election I've ever seen. Roy Moore had leads of 12 and 8 points wiped out almost instantly. Huge chucks of uncontested votes coming in for Jones as he outvoted Moore by 70,000 votes in the final 35%. Very sketchy action in a red state.
Now I find myself looking at this tweet from Liz Crokin in which she shows a post from Q predicting the result of the election, but elaborating that it will all happen so that the people can finally come to understand the corruption of the elites:
[Doug Jones] will have more votes than Roy Moore. The multiple fraudulent voting techniques used to achieve this result are being allowed to occur. They are being documented. The subsequent investigation will reveal the entire Democrat machine. This was put into play long ago.
Paired with this is a screenshot of Trump's reaction, who seems to be alluding to a similar scandal:
"The write in votes played a big factor"
"The Republicans will have another shot at this seat in a very short period of time. It never ends!"
OKAY, now rewind back to November 5th, and I'm going to quote @Commoner now because of how relevant it is:
This was posted on Nov. 5 by Q. Notice some comments are said twice . . and this post was made before the Virginia election (Nov. 7). Did Q foreshadow that TWO elections would occur before JUSTICE would be served?
"Is the US political / election system corrupt?
Who owns poll machines?
Soros?
Why is this relevant?
They never thought she would lose.
They never thought she would lose.
Fantasy land.
Fantasy land.
The complete picture would put 99% of Americans (the World) in a hospital.
POTUS is our savior.
Pray.
Operators are active.
We are at war.
Goodnight BO."
Remember this. We could be looking at the next HUGE scandal that puts the nail in the coffin for all the doubters. Prepare to do two things in the coming days/weeks (the two may not be mutually exclusive):
1) Meme
2)Red pill
view the rest of the comments →
Madwack ago
I saw the #'s last night on infowars and it looks like 1/2 of the people who normally vote republican just went poof.....the dems got the same amount of votes they normally get.
KnightsofHubris ago
Think it could have anything to do with the fact the Republican candidate liked to date HS girls?
What you are talking describing is all about turnout. First off you can't compare the numbers to the presidential year. You have to compare to an off year election. Secondly, Alabama Democrats were motivated to come out than they have been in years. They knew they had a real shot to win this and had a good candidate. They turned out. The Republicans had a bad candidate, they did not turn out. Look at all the write in votes. Those are Republicans who didn't want to vote for Moore. Lots of Republicans just stayed home.
Not only was a Moore a bad candidate, he was invisible in the last week. People were saying he might not even be in the State. He didn't wanted to answer any pedophile questions so he was avoiding the press. The Republican Senator from Alabama came out and said he was not voting for Moore. Obama did a get out the vote robocall for Doug Jones. Jones got more votes than Obama did. Why? Democrats in Alabama knew their state was going Republican anyway.
JMJMilitia ago
Write in votes could also refer to votes that are mailed in by elderly or less mobile voters.
KnightsofHubris ago
Write in votes are different from mail in ballots aren't they?
If you were mailing your ballot and voting for Moore or Jones, you could just pick Moore or Jones, you don't have to write them in.
There were reports in press of write in campaigns, for Republicans would wouldn't vote for Jones, but couldn't vote for Moore. How many votes do you think Nick Saban will get?