I'll start from the top, where suspicions had arisen. Bill Mitchell tweets this out after the results come in:
Ok guys, strangest election I've ever seen. Roy Moore had leads of 12 and 8 points wiped out almost instantly. Huge chucks of uncontested votes coming in for Jones as he outvoted Moore by 70,000 votes in the final 35%. Very sketchy action in a red state.
Now I find myself looking at this tweet from Liz Crokin in which she shows a post from Q predicting the result of the election, but elaborating that it will all happen so that the people can finally come to understand the corruption of the elites:
[Doug Jones] will have more votes than Roy Moore. The multiple fraudulent voting techniques used to achieve this result are being allowed to occur. They are being documented. The subsequent investigation will reveal the entire Democrat machine. This was put into play long ago.
Paired with this is a screenshot of Trump's reaction, who seems to be alluding to a similar scandal:
"The write in votes played a big factor"
"The Republicans will have another shot at this seat in a very short period of time. It never ends!"
OKAY, now rewind back to November 5th, and I'm going to quote @Commoner now because of how relevant it is:
This was posted on Nov. 5 by Q. Notice some comments are said twice . . and this post was made before the Virginia election (Nov. 7). Did Q foreshadow that TWO elections would occur before JUSTICE would be served?
"Is the US political / election system corrupt?
Who owns poll machines?
Soros?
Why is this relevant?
They never thought she would lose.
They never thought she would lose.
Fantasy land.
Fantasy land.
The complete picture would put 99% of Americans (the World) in a hospital.
POTUS is our savior.
Pray.
Operators are active.
We are at war.
Goodnight BO."
Remember this. We could be looking at the next HUGE scandal that puts the nail in the coffin for all the doubters. Prepare to do two things in the coming days/weeks (the two may not be mutually exclusive):
1) Meme
2)Red pill
view the rest of the comments →
migratorypatterns ago
What I'm wondering is how many more times Q can be wrong without everyone hanging on his every word.
Is there a tipping point? My guess: NOPE!
The_Savant ago
Out of curiosity, which times was Q wrong in the past? I can ping you in a post that shows Q to be consistently correct if you want.
lerker ago
Q said Podesta was getting indicted on 11/3 and Huma on 11/6
migratorypatterns ago
You know, I really don't follow Q, so I don't keep a running list. There was one ridiculous claim about arrests and martial law being imposed. First it was one date and then he moved it back to the holidays ... maybe around Thanksgiving? I believe that's the case because Liz Crokin and others were going crazy and saying that it would be easier to arrest Hillary and declare martial law around the holidays. Some whacked out YouTuber even tied in troops arriving with it being true, but they were there to put on a show or demonstration.
There was a time before that ... think in October. It might have been another promise of arrests. It was the first time I'd heard of Q and whatever was promised didn't materialize. Then he started with Hefner being the white rabbit and I was like, this guy is making this up on the fly.