You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Hey @migratorypatterns,

You haven't articlulated direct connection to the sexual abuse of kids by the global elite, so I really have to remove this for the sake of consistency. When Bill starts reporting on child abusers, we'll leave it up. :-)

migratorypatterns ago

You see, it's here where the rules start getting all cloudy for me.

If a subject has been covered on Voat, I assume it's going to be allowed, but that's not what happens. The election and installing Killary as The Cannibal Queen Elect was consistent in the emails that were the launching pad of pizzagate. Besides throwing kids in the pool for entertainment, there was a consistent strategizing in controlling the press, etc. Part of the winning was to smear Trump since the wiretapping turned up zip. I mean, how the hell clean did Trump have to be for them NOT to come up with dirt even with him being wiretapped? So they invite/pay for fake dossiers and leak off camera interviews that were secretly recorded, and, oh, yes, skanks that had cream pie anal sex on camera for $1500 came forward to protest being sexually harassed by Trump! All for him to lose the election! So the parade of heifers vehemently complained about such things as him not asking permission to kiss before he planted one on her lips and that he took a woman's number and never called her!!!! WOW!!! That's heinous! Then there's another skank/whore's family being convicted of human trafficking AND being a good friend of Killary. So it's an established MO. We know that from the hit job done on Roy Moore. Those skank's stories are as credible as Allred herself. So when the pattern continues and somebody, O'Reilly in this case, actually purports to have proof of the dems being guilty of PAYING for these heifers to lie? Oh, no! Reporting THAT story is not part of pizzagate?!!!! How do you figure? Let me ask you this, why the hell are stories about Seth Rich allowed then? There are ZERO tie ins to child trafficking or molestation. Yeah, somebody pointed to a Disney print, but, no, those are sold by the truckful to collectors. I'm talking Seth Rich being murdered. He wasn't molesting children. There's no proof he was, so why was it allowed? Oh, that's right ... because it tied into the emails, in that, he might have been acting as a whistleblower in leaking the emails to Assange. And why is that important? Because it would impact the election. You see how everything is about who is in power? And the propaganda against the POTUS is enormous! It's propaganda 24/7. But you don't see how it's tied to pizzagate, eh?

Whatever. I can't possibly understand what you guys/gals are doing in your decision making process. I really can't. Rich was allowed partly because it was tied to the MO Killary uses on political enemies and skanks/heifers coming forward to lie? Oh, yeah! It's another MO that's used, but, of course, it doesn't matter because these rules aren't supposed to be logical. They're arbitrary at best seemingly based on shills reporting posts and whining about how someone is spamming the boards. So really, the number one rule is: If you're a shill and whine, a mod will appease you.

Vindicator ago

Reilly in this case, actually purports to have proof of the dems being guilty of PAYING for these heifers to lie? Oh, no! Reporting THAT story is not part of pizzagate?!!!! How do you figure? Let me ask you this, why the hell are stories about Seth Rich allowed then?

I hear your frustration and respect your assessment of lack of consistency. I myself am often frustrated by trying to enforce the rules.

Seth Rich was allowed because there is a possibility he played a role leaking the DNC emails to Wikileaks, and that he was murdered to cover up what ELSE he might know and reveal (pizzagate), and those failing to investigate his murder also failed to investigate the child porn found on the Comet server.

My bias is to leave up everything I possibly can, and let votes decide. If you made a case that O'Reilly's tape is connected because it shows just how desperate they are to stop Trump from remaining in power long enough to weed out and prosecute the VIPedos, and how that is now a much more likely possibility given the tape, I would probably leave it up. But you have to make the argument.

Franken is a gray area. He groped women, but made jokes about raping babies. His ouster after so many inexplicable years of getting a pass is a possible sign that tides are turning and the pedos may soon be exposed as well. We've removed most posts about him.

Q has made numerous references to pizzagate, Haiti, Satanism and characterized the Cabal as "sick". He has positioned himself as a voice of hope and encouragement to pizzagate researchers, urging further digging and meme warfare and predicting events to show he is legit. I see him as similar to the role clandestine radio played for the French Resistance during WWII. We were specifically told by kevdude to leave up and sticky alphabravo's original Q post, though I think they need to be combined into a megathread that gets updated in the Comments, rather than numerous little tidbit posts. I am mulling doing a sticky asking people's feedback on that.

Migratory, how would you do things differently overall? What criteria would you use? How would you change the wording of the rules or the definition of pizzagate we currently have to make the subverse better, more enjoyable, etc.? I would love to hear your thoughts.

migratorypatterns ago

Migratory, how would you do things differently overall? What criteria would you use?

I'll have to give this some thought, but as for Q, one big thread doesn't cut it. If someone finds something he says as a jumping off point for a post, the post should stay up. Why? Because points and ideas get lost in a huge thread. I don't read every single comment, and sometimes valuable information is overlooked, so individual posts are not something that mods should frown upon or discourage. Instead, see which ones have legs. If the post disappears and drops off the first page in an hour or two, and there are limited views of comments, you know the community is not interested. If, however, it generates or stimulates interest (much like the CDAN Arizona thread - KABOOM!), you know it's valid. If a separate thread is validated in this way, then the link to that thread should be preserved/included in the mega sticky thread . This will satisfy individual members to take a flyer in pursuing a lead and keep us happy, but keep the information in one convenient place for followers of Q to find. I'm not a follower of Q, but I absolutely see the necessity of reporting and keeping tabs on what he's saying/posting. If you don't it would be like the media saying that ANTIFA is a terrorist organization so we won't write about them anymore. What? No! It's because they are the outlaws and pirates that you're mandated to keep tabs on them because they're a huge part of what is going on. And to take the pulse of an issue, you include everything to get an overall view. It's why when certain shills who shall remain nameless start shrieking,, "LARPER! LARPER!", I cease to listen. If Q is a LARPER (and I believe he is), it's because a LARPER has become part of pizzagate. Therefore, his posts and posts about him or his clues should remain up.

As for the rest of this, I'll have to think this through.

Vindicator ago

Some great points. Thanks for your response. :-)

migratorypatterns ago

Thanks and I'm glad you got something out of it.

Still working on the other more general question about the subverse.