What is the strongest form of opponent in chess? Answer: a 'centaur'. Not a human, not an AI (Komodo, Houdini, Stockfish), but a human-AI combination (and not a strong grandmaster-AI combination either but, counter-intuitively, a strong programmer-AI combination.) Maybe that's what Q is: a centaur. We started off with Anons (FBIAnon, MegaAnon) that were more obviously human and straightforward - able to tell us an apparently inside story in a straightforward manner - to something more AI-like, conversationally-fragmented, pseudo-poetic, pseudo-mystical even. Far too sophisticated to be a kid in his/her garage. Far too sophisticated to be Trump (how could anyone think him capable of this?) or any of the people immediately around him. Almost certainly a team of some kind which has evolved its house-style from the early Anons. The real question though is not 'is Q an insider?' nor is the real question 'is Q a human?' The real question is whether or not Q is well-motivated. Like the earlier Anons, Q asks you to swallow a narrative which casts Jeffrey Epstein's next-door neighbour, the Rockefeller-bankrolled (long predicted in the cabal programming) POTUS as a latter-day Jesus Christ casting the evildoers out of the temple. That's the bit that is hard (impossible?) to swallow. Of course he/she/it could be an insider - and he/she/it could be a centaur - but that bit doesn't matter half as much as the motivation.