You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

GeorgeHodelDidit ago

The author Nabakov was a victim of pedophilia...his uncle put his penis in his butt for years...Nabakov hated Freud and his famous children false memory crap. Nabakov felt it was bullshit designed to cover up raping kids and he was right. Almost everything Nabakov ever wrote was about pedophiles. He was trying to tell us what was up many years ago. He seemed to know from seeing Shirley Temple movies that they were not very well covered Pedophile friendly films....he shared a birthday with Shirley and made a book putting in lots of secrets about Shirley Temple.

Nabakov knew no one would report his complaints of Pedophilia seriously so he put in lots of secret meanings in his work and you would not be able to understand unless you were smart as hell and you read EVERYTHING he ever wrote. If you did all that you would have to believe he really put clues even in his very first published stories. Guy was driven to expose Pedophiles.

belsenwasagas ago

Freud and his famous children false memory crap

Freud did change his mind about that.

3141592653 ago

I thought it was the opposite. He supported abuse victims, then he did a 180 on it later in his career

belsenwasagas ago

When patients started describing incest and childhood sexual abuse it was so anathema to Victorian era assumptions that even Freud couldn't believe what he was hearing and assumed they where describing repressed fantasies. A position he did later reverse.

3141592653 ago

I'm pretty sure he supported people disclosing childhood sexual abuse, but that he did a 180 / betrayal as his career progressed, saying abuse victims were hysterical and/or making it all up. Could be that we both are correct.