One piece of "evidence" that I've seen over and over again is the photo of JP with a fish and the number 14 painted on his hands.
I debunked that photo over a year ago and it has been used and re-used, bantered about and re-propped up and is still used today as proof of absolutely nothing at all.
(The debunking was in the form of a very obvious explanation: He was clearly Tweet-promoting the UN agenda related to saving the environment. All you need to do is read his Twitter for any length of time to see this is an issue he cares about.)
Goal #14 is simply: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources...(Hence the FISH symbol and the number 14! Doh!)
The 14 and the fish are 100% directly tied to that, even on the UN website: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/oceans/
I didn't join PG to particiapte in a witch-hunt or to falsely accuse people of anything.
Though it appears there are huge mysteries surrounding many OTHER facts/ideas behind PG, the echo chamber of actual bullshit needs to truly stop.
The internet should be scrubbed of that iconic 14/fish / photo and the guy should be apologized to over it. The explanation I proffered came pretty easily, just by reading many of his older tweets. His connection to environmental matters is pretty hard to overlook.
If the guy actually turns out to be just a passionate "foodie", then many here look a bit ridiculous as well.
THIS all said, IF anyone is actually hurting kids -- I have no problem with anyone continuing to do what we can, to put a stop to it and bring justice about for these priceless souls, but if all we have is a collection of assumptive facts and a fairy-tale narrative, are we doing right?
Yes. The Instagram stuff is beyond disgusting, but that wasn't JP. Yes, the bands are sick, but what does that have to do with JP? Yes, the comments by SL are over the top, but that was at CPP, not by JP.
Yes, I find JA to be uncomfortably creepy, but that isn't JP. Yes, the artwork is over-the-top disgusting, but that is TP, not JP. Spirit cooking looks reprehensible and gross, but does this prove what it has been assumed to prove?
The photo of the teddy bear in the adult bedroom is bizarre, but bizarre does not make a case such as what is implied.
Yes, I find the debunking and censorship over-the-moon bizarre, and yes, it "feels" like something is amiss in all this -- somewhere, but can we justify tormenting anyone whatsoever without any actual proof of anything at all?
I am not excusing/minimizing or making excuses for anyone. I just know for a fact that PG has gotten it wrong with several so-called smoking gun facts and is very slow to retract them -- and I find that disturbing to be a part of.
What I'm saying is that we need to be sure that this thread is always about keeping it real.
Seeking truth and telling the truth are not always the same and knowing the difference is essential.
view the rest of the comments →
gaystapo ago
His finger was cut in the same place instructed for the spirit cooking ritual. That was the significance.
CantStopCrying ago
Fair enough.
But that is not what the 14 / Fish pic has been described to mean.
I don't find Spirit Cooking to be anything other than deeply disturbing and utterly gross, but whether or not the guy is into it, doesn't mean that people ought literally make up whatever fantasy they want about a picture that has a very clear intended meaning and ruin the guy's life over it:
http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Is he guilty of something? Maybe. Of everything? Maybe.
But, when an iconic piece of evidence like that is easily debunked, I think we ought to pump the brakes a bit.
His protesting and nervousness in the recent interview COULD be a sign of guilt. Could it ALSO be a sign, that the guy is tormented by what ALSO could be false?
How SHOULD the guy react if some of this IS false?
The Internet has ruined his life. If he deserves it, I'm not complaining.
If he does not deserve it, then I don't want that blood on my hands.
That iconic photo has been used to much that it has taken on a life of its' own when it just might simply mean this: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Are_we__sure ago
i think you're realizing you may have taken part in a witch hunt.
The folks here are not trying to determine guilt or innocence. He was guilty in their eyes before the emails were release. Guilty of something....They are simply trying to find ways to convince you of guilt. You can see in this thread how immune people are to evidence, how easy it is to make up double meanings to that will make him look guilty.
The truth is there is absolutely no crimes connected at all to the Podesta emails.
Shizy ago
FUCK OFF SHILL