One piece of "evidence" that I've seen over and over again is the photo of JP with a fish and the number 14 painted on his hands.
I debunked that photo over a year ago and it has been used and re-used, bantered about and re-propped up and is still used today as proof of absolutely nothing at all.
(The debunking was in the form of a very obvious explanation: He was clearly Tweet-promoting the UN agenda related to saving the environment. All you need to do is read his Twitter for any length of time to see this is an issue he cares about.)
Goal #14 is simply: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources...(Hence the FISH symbol and the number 14! Doh!)
The 14 and the fish are 100% directly tied to that, even on the UN website: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/oceans/
I didn't join PG to particiapte in a witch-hunt or to falsely accuse people of anything.
Though it appears there are huge mysteries surrounding many OTHER facts/ideas behind PG, the echo chamber of actual bullshit needs to truly stop.
The internet should be scrubbed of that iconic 14/fish / photo and the guy should be apologized to over it. The explanation I proffered came pretty easily, just by reading many of his older tweets. His connection to environmental matters is pretty hard to overlook.
If the guy actually turns out to be just a passionate "foodie", then many here look a bit ridiculous as well.
THIS all said, IF anyone is actually hurting kids -- I have no problem with anyone continuing to do what we can, to put a stop to it and bring justice about for these priceless souls, but if all we have is a collection of assumptive facts and a fairy-tale narrative, are we doing right?
Yes. The Instagram stuff is beyond disgusting, but that wasn't JP. Yes, the bands are sick, but what does that have to do with JP? Yes, the comments by SL are over the top, but that was at CPP, not by JP.
Yes, I find JA to be uncomfortably creepy, but that isn't JP. Yes, the artwork is over-the-top disgusting, but that is TP, not JP. Spirit cooking looks reprehensible and gross, but does this prove what it has been assumed to prove?
The photo of the teddy bear in the adult bedroom is bizarre, but bizarre does not make a case such as what is implied.
Yes, I find the debunking and censorship over-the-moon bizarre, and yes, it "feels" like something is amiss in all this -- somewhere, but can we justify tormenting anyone whatsoever without any actual proof of anything at all?
I am not excusing/minimizing or making excuses for anyone. I just know for a fact that PG has gotten it wrong with several so-called smoking gun facts and is very slow to retract them -- and I find that disturbing to be a part of.
What I'm saying is that we need to be sure that this thread is always about keeping it real.
Seeking truth and telling the truth are not always the same and knowing the difference is essential.
view the rest of the comments →
WhyAserverWasBuilt ago
"if anyone is actually hurting kids?"
Really? So far There is almost 40 years documented history of as politicians, military officials, judges and law enforcement hurting kids. The clintons run the pedo show and the money laundering operation handed over from HW Bush who set it up with Hoover years ago. No matter what John podesta is there is a picture in safe keeping, to keep him in line. Sign forget the fish. Follow the money. You no longer wonder "if" they are hurting kids.
CantStopCrying ago
We know that there are people who are hurting kids.
That is not in question.
I questioned one piece of very-iconic "evidence".
Take note of the shit-storm that has ensued.
Do you stand for that?
The 14 and the Fish clearly came from here: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
If it means more than that -- so be it.
But, I wish someone would try to prove it and not just make up fairy-tales about what it COULD mean or what we WANT it to mean.
What if it just means exactly as it was stated to mean: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
For that one-fact alone, JP deserves further consideration.
I'm not about NOT protecting kids.
But, I don't protect kids, but NOT protecting the truth -- whatever and wherever that truth leads, whether I LIKE it or not, whether it confuses the narrative or not, whether it is POPULAR or not.
We must remain OBJECTIVE.