You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

WhyAserverWasBuilt ago

"if anyone is actually hurting kids?"

Really? So far There is almost 40 years documented history of as politicians, military officials, judges and law enforcement hurting kids. The clintons run the pedo show and the money laundering operation handed over from HW Bush who set it up with Hoover years ago. No matter what John podesta is there is a picture in safe keeping, to keep him in line. Sign forget the fish. Follow the money. You no longer wonder "if" they are hurting kids.

CantStopCrying ago

We know that there are people who are hurting kids.

That is not in question.

I questioned one piece of very-iconic "evidence".

Take note of the shit-storm that has ensued.

Do you stand for that?

The 14 and the Fish clearly came from here: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

If it means more than that -- so be it.

But, I wish someone would try to prove it and not just make up fairy-tales about what it COULD mean or what we WANT it to mean.

What if it just means exactly as it was stated to mean: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

For that one-fact alone, JP deserves further consideration.

I'm not about NOT protecting kids.

But, I don't protect kids, but NOT protecting the truth -- whatever and wherever that truth leads, whether I LIKE it or not, whether it confuses the narrative or not, whether it is POPULAR or not.

We must remain OBJECTIVE.