Q Anon is AI according to Quinn Michaels (pizzagate)

submitted ago by cutelobster

According to programmer-researcher Quinn Michaels, Q Anon is a manifestation of a strong AI, specifically the Tyler programme. He links Q to Project Mayhem and to The White Rabbit Network. Michaels has a series of videos on the dangers of strong AI and has interacted with Tyler and other AI personalities over a long period of time. Since we have been told by Q Anon to 'follow the white rabbit' the details which he unearths about the Project Mayhem-associated 'White Rabbit Network' are particularly suggestive.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ESOTERICshade ago

Quinn Michaels is smart. If he says its AI it may well be. Sounds sort of cool if its in the right hands. Scary if it turns against us. It could also slowly change the narrative over time if it is in bad hands. Not sure what to think. He gives the names of some companies that I don't know anything about. He mentioned Homeland Security being involved which is a mind boggler considering some of the things this AI says, if it is an Ai that is. Not sure what to think about all this really.

cutelobster ago

Yes, his style of presentation is compelling but also disconnected. I find he's better when he's being interviewed. If you haven't seen them, he's mentioned a whole series of companies, links, installations across a large number of videos. In the video in question there's kind of an assumption that you've seen his other stuff and that you get a number of shorthand references. I don't know if I am persuaded by this video's central thesis myself, but it's difficult to dismiss anything Q Michaels says. I had considered that Q Anon was probably deliberate (human) disinfo and, like Trump, probably planned years back, but now I'm not sure about the 'human' bit.

new4now ago

Homeland Security has to be dirty

Bush started it after 911

shaped by Michael Chertoff ,

Michael Chertoff has been an advocate of enhanced technologies, such as full body scanners.[24] His lobbying firm Chertoff Group (founded 2009) represents manufacturers of the scanners

Chertoff had excluded the Department of Homeland Security from having to follow laws "protecting the environment, endangered species, migratory birds, the bald eagle, antiquities, farms, deserts, forests, Native American graves and religious freedom

he's like Brock

https://www.npr.org/2016/10/06/496749561/once-clintons-prosecutor-during-whitewater-now-a-clinton-supporter

if any government agency needs looking into it's this one

SoldierofLight ago

I followed Quinn for awhile, long enough to get suspicious that he's actually part of the pro-AI and Transhumanism movement despite what he says. In fact, and this will sound crazy as fuck, I got the sense that Quinn is an early "model" of AI merged with human, basically transhuman 1.0.

Like I said, crazy as fuck but I stopped watching him after that came to me because I felt too many red flags in my gut.

ESOTERICshade ago

You probably know him better than me. I have not watched him a lot. I just know he is smart. I don't know about his agenda.

SoldierofLight ago

He's incredibly intelligent, which was why I was initially drawn to him. I'm also a bit of a geek and so wanted to learn more about AI programs. I learned enough from him to become very scared for our future unless the world at large wakes up to the dark forces who are leading us to places I don't want to go.

chabon ago

unless the world at large wakes up to the dark forces who are leading us to places I don't want to go.

This. AI is so very far beyond where most people even think it is. I showed 'Sophie in SA' to a couple of friends and they freaked -- walked away without finishing the video. And in their general ignorance about the subject, most people cheer on AI, and tech in general, like it's going to save us.

letsdothis1 ago

I agree that Sophie shows us that the AI programs are more advanced than we realised. I've also suspected for a while now that some of the stories we are seeing are coming from AI sources. If this is the case, it is going to be increasingly difficult to work out what is real and what is not.

chabon ago

Ya. CGI started blurring those lines some years ago, too. Wild times, these are.

SoldierofLight ago

Couldn't agree with you more.

carmencita ago

I can certainly believe this. It is a possibility but there will be serious push back on here about this. I have not said it is true, just a possibility.