I'd just add that virtually every convoluted "its fake news" message is different, but I have always been successful--when trying to red-pill friends and family---with the mosy basic argument: "Given what LEOs say the code-talk means, can you explain away with any detail the Podesta emails w/ all the references to pizza, etc....?" NOBODY can do it. The response to articles like this one should always be "Not listening until you explain THAT."
There are plenty of examples of individuals who are well-informed on the case, Wikileaks postings by credible people....So you are demanding a PUBLISHED list? The FBI has published their SYMBOLS. Have you seen them? Pizzas, the disgusting boy-lover logo...seen all over the Comet Pizza place and their pubs/menus....rational connections are then made by reasonable people. On what authority do you claim that the code-talk idea is false?
You'd need just as much special knowledge to be able to prove it false as any of us would need to PROVE it true.
Do I need a published source, or is this site dedicated to civilian data collection and group-analysis of facts?
Explain why the Podesta emails make sense if those sick bastards AREN'T talking in code about something.
There are plenty of examples of individuals who are well-informed on the case
A. So provide one.
B. Don't move the goal posts. You said Law Enforcement.
Wikileaks postings by credible people....So you are demanding a PUBLISHED list?
Wikileaks postings by credible people? Seriously? Yes, a published list would be great.
The FBI has published their SYMBOLS. Have you seen them? Pizzas, the disgusting boy-lover logo
You seem to realize that Symbols are not Words, but still you want to go down this road. Also the FBI document on symbols does not mention pizza. Why do you include it?
On what authority do you claim that the code-talk idea is false?
It's completely made up. It doesn't exist whatsoever prior to Podesta's emails being published. That's my authority. You can do the search yourself.
You'd need just as much special knowledge to be able to prove it false as any of us would need to PROVE it true.
No, you can do a simple google search for ten years before podesta emails were released and you won't find any results.
Do I need a published source, or is this site dedicated to civilian data collection and group-analysis of facts?
You need to explain why you fell for a hoax list and continue to defend it. You claimed Law Enforcement Officers are the source of the list. That is false. There is zero code in the Podesta emails.
Every one of the Podesta emails makes sense literally, even if odd wording is used. Walnut sauce is the perfect example of that.
view the rest of the comments →
letsdothis1 ago
When you see a journalist start a news story like that know that what follows is an emotive conbobulation that can only be described as fiction.
Hortance ago
Thats a "tell" isn't it?
I'd just add that virtually every convoluted "its fake news" message is different, but I have always been successful--when trying to red-pill friends and family---with the mosy basic argument: "Given what LEOs say the code-talk means, can you explain away with any detail the Podesta emails w/ all the references to pizza, etc....?" NOBODY can do it. The response to articles like this one should always be "Not listening until you explain THAT."
Are_we__sure ago
Your big red pill is false. Where's your evidence of a Law Enforcement endorsed code list?
Hortance ago
There are plenty of examples of individuals who are well-informed on the case, Wikileaks postings by credible people....So you are demanding a PUBLISHED list? The FBI has published their SYMBOLS. Have you seen them? Pizzas, the disgusting boy-lover logo...seen all over the Comet Pizza place and their pubs/menus....rational connections are then made by reasonable people. On what authority do you claim that the code-talk idea is false? You'd need just as much special knowledge to be able to prove it false as any of us would need to PROVE it true.
Do I need a published source, or is this site dedicated to civilian data collection and group-analysis of facts?
Explain why the Podesta emails make sense if those sick bastards AREN'T talking in code about something.
Are_we__sure ago
A. So provide one.
B. Don't move the goal posts. You said Law Enforcement.
Wikileaks postings by credible people? Seriously? Yes, a published list would be great.
You seem to realize that Symbols are not Words, but still you want to go down this road. Also the FBI document on symbols does not mention pizza. Why do you include it?
It's completely made up. It doesn't exist whatsoever prior to Podesta's emails being published. That's my authority. You can do the search yourself.
No, you can do a simple google search for ten years before podesta emails were released and you won't find any results.
You need to explain why you fell for a hoax list and continue to defend it. You claimed Law Enforcement Officers are the source of the list. That is false. There is zero code in the Podesta emails.
Every one of the Podesta emails makes sense literally, even if odd wording is used. Walnut sauce is the perfect example of that.
Shizy ago
If you really think there's nothing being discussed in code in the podesta emails you should off yourself now
Are_we_sure ago
Show me one thing in code and how you determined what it means.