I have a bunch of Rolling Stone Magazine's for the nineties I should probably dig through them and see if there's any good dirt in it because it really feels like this magazine is nothing more than a CIA psyops program
Rolling Stone and Vice are both CIA propaganda rags as far as I've been able to figure out. I'm not saying PG isn't a russian psy-op itself, I think it was a deliberated targeted strike - an infowar tactical nuke of sorts. That would explain why fake news trends chime with Pizzagate on Google Trends. "Fake News" started to trend slightly before PG broke, my guess is that the CIA side got a tip off the Russians were planning something big and so the Fake News campaign was started to provide a defence against the coming strike.
So yes, there is plenty of fake news, on both sides of the infowar. That is what they don't want to tell you, its all the Russians are doing this, the Russians are doing that, never "We're both in a full scale propaganda war with each other". And its not to say that PG isn't based on some truth. The Russians I think knew some of the seedier side of what was going on in Washington from their own agents and PG was a direct strike by them.
The Russians I think knew some of the seedier side of what was going on in Washington from their own agents and PG was a direct strike by them.
Wow. Someone here is really floating "the Russians did it." I was cracking up at the end of the Rolling Stones article that they actually went there -- only to find @diamonddust2 gamely offering it here.
You're either very, very new to the investigation of the self-called 'elite' in preying on and trafficking children -- or you are what we call around these parts, a shill. I think. I'm new here. And it's late. But I'm pretty sure this is what shill means.
Not at all floating "The Russians did it", that is what morons with an agenda say,or those who can't face they lost the election. But the idea Russia is passive is nonsense. Unless you've been living under a rock you'd be aware Russia is in an infowar with the globalists. More power to them, I hate the globalists. If they saw PG (they'd likely have their own spooks installed in DC cos its crawling with US intelligence types), why wouldn't they take advantage by making sure it got heard about?
And why wouldn't the DC folk panic soon as they got wind and suddenly have to start crying "fake news" to cover it up? Fake News was a nobody term before PG, and then all of a sudden its fake news this, fake news that. That was NOT a coincidence.
"Fake News" started to trend slightly before PG broke, my guess is that the CIA side got a tip off the Russians were planning something big and so the Fake News campaign was started to provide a defence against the coming strike.
"Fake News" was born in the DNC in an email. I saw the wikileaks email. It basically said "if something big comes out its fake news." Birthing of talking points.
And its not to say that PG isn't based on some truth. The Russians I think knew some of the seedier side of what was going on in Washington from their own agents and PG was a direct strike by them.
Pizzagate story broke because clever internet people understood the code in wikileaks emails. As people were pouring through the emails Julian Assange asked a question to the email diggers in a hinting way without telling them exactly what it meant. I caused people to better focus in the right areas.
view the rest of the comments →
RageAgainstTheAmish ago
I have a bunch of Rolling Stone Magazine's for the nineties I should probably dig through them and see if there's any good dirt in it because it really feels like this magazine is nothing more than a CIA psyops program
diamonddust2 ago
Rolling Stone and Vice are both CIA propaganda rags as far as I've been able to figure out. I'm not saying PG isn't a russian psy-op itself, I think it was a deliberated targeted strike - an infowar tactical nuke of sorts. That would explain why fake news trends chime with Pizzagate on Google Trends. "Fake News" started to trend slightly before PG broke, my guess is that the CIA side got a tip off the Russians were planning something big and so the Fake News campaign was started to provide a defence against the coming strike.
So yes, there is plenty of fake news, on both sides of the infowar. That is what they don't want to tell you, its all the Russians are doing this, the Russians are doing that, never "We're both in a full scale propaganda war with each other". And its not to say that PG isn't based on some truth. The Russians I think knew some of the seedier side of what was going on in Washington from their own agents and PG was a direct strike by them.
chabon ago
Wow. Someone here is really floating "the Russians did it." I was cracking up at the end of the Rolling Stones article that they actually went there -- only to find @diamonddust2 gamely offering it here.
You're either very, very new to the investigation of the self-called 'elite' in preying on and trafficking children -- or you are what we call around these parts, a shill. I think. I'm new here. And it's late. But I'm pretty sure this is what shill means.
diamonddust2 ago
Not at all floating "The Russians did it", that is what morons with an agenda say,or those who can't face they lost the election. But the idea Russia is passive is nonsense. Unless you've been living under a rock you'd be aware Russia is in an infowar with the globalists. More power to them, I hate the globalists. If they saw PG (they'd likely have their own spooks installed in DC cos its crawling with US intelligence types), why wouldn't they take advantage by making sure it got heard about?
And why wouldn't the DC folk panic soon as they got wind and suddenly have to start crying "fake news" to cover it up? Fake News was a nobody term before PG, and then all of a sudden its fake news this, fake news that. That was NOT a coincidence.
If i'm a shill i must be a terrible one.
ESOTERICshade ago
"Fake News" was born in the DNC in an email. I saw the wikileaks email. It basically said "if something big comes out its fake news." Birthing of talking points.
Pizzagate story broke because clever internet people understood the code in wikileaks emails. As people were pouring through the emails Julian Assange asked a question to the email diggers in a hinting way without telling them exactly what it meant. I caused people to better focus in the right areas.