Does anyone have an explanation why discussing the possibility of a drug called "Adrenochrome" being harvested from children and used by satanists is not pertinent to the subject of child/human trafficking? Seems like last time I was here..... it was the same thing... pertinent information deemed irrelevant and then erased. Interesting way to get to the bottom of things. I suppose. Glad the oh mighty mods are on the job to censor as they see fit. Thank you, but I don't appreciate being censored and would appreciate explanation as to why a subject here without thumbs down, but instead thumbs up and productive conversation started is so quickly and easily censored. Please allow the collective to make those decisions. That is flat out censorship along the same lines as is done by Google and raises suspicion as the motive.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@Flat_Truth, perhaps you are posting from a mobile device and can't see the submission rules in our sidebar. This post belongs in v/pizzagatemods or in v/pizzagatewhatever, or both. v/pizzagate is for serious source-linked research posts only. We have shills pushing all kinds of BS here every day to try to make this sub look like a bunch of wackos; that's why we require coherent arguments backed by evidence and have separate sister-subverses for discussion about the moderation of the sub, and discussion about speculative theories that have little or no supporting evidence as of yet. Our rules do not allow you to make posts saying "Hey, what if XXX? Someone should research this." The onus is on the submitter to do enough research to be able to present a plausible link. I am removing this post per Rule 4.
Regarding the question posed in your post: No one has ever made a substantive, thoroughly researched post showing evidence of a likely connection between blood or organ harvesting and the sexual and other abuse of kids by the global elite. There has been a lot of speculation, and a lot of disinfo peddling, but no actual reliable evidence this is happening.
No one has provided evidence such a drug exists, or that it is even chemically possible as theorized. There have been numerous replies to such posts from different users debunking the idea.
There has been scientific evidence that transfusions of young blood might cure diseases of aging (parabiosis), but no evidence so far that kids' blood has been stolen, or that kids have been abducted and exsanguinated. The only organ harvesting evidence I've seen has not been connected to the abuse of kids by the global elite. Until such evidence is presented from reliable sources, we are considering this topic likely disinfo and will remove it.
Flat_Truth ago
Got it. I will discuss it in one of those other forums then if I get around to it. Thanks for taking the time to explain. I still say discussion of it is more pertinent to the investigation than news of Roy Moore and the Hollywood celebs diddling around with teenagers. Its going to take some brainstorming, will try and do that elsewhere and if solid tangible evidence comes up, will bring it back here for discussion.
The point of my original post that was deleted is there was a site found, which I linked to elsewhere last night. It did act as evidence the drug existed, as it was a large addiction website and had the drug listed with all the details. My original post was to show I found that site and coincidentally it was taken down today or "suspended"... the information gone. People in the comments were able to find archive of it.....and listed that in the comments... thus giving evidence the drug is real, is used, its effects described, signs and symptoms of addiction and treatment for addition to the drug adrenochrome.
Vindicator ago
I agree it is fishy that link was suspended right after you posted about it. From my perspective, it is further evidence that we need to be generating the most serious, hard-hitting, irrefutable research possible here in the main sub, because we are being watched and constantly subjected to efforts to undermine the validity of what we publish. We definitely should investigate this -- and publish credible findings here when we have them nailed down. But those two things need to happen in different subverses. Remember, it's not enough to prove the drug exists; you also need to cite sources verifying it has the effects the hypothesis requires (it gives a "high" worth killing kids for), that it is likely being manufactured (i.e. the process is feasible for black market drug production), and that there is some reason animals couldn't be used instead of kids. Then you'll have to show a connection to the elite of some kind.
I personally think the parabiosis hypothesis for Pizzagate is a much stronger angle to pursue. Just as many people have no qualms about aborting inconvenient offspring, I suspect many wealthy people would jump at the chance to turn back the aging clock with transfusions of young blood, and wouldn't ask too many questions about how it was acquired. I could see the abortion industry easily playing a role. But so far, there's no evidence this is actually happening yet, other than the missing kids.
Vindicator ago
@jangles @SecondAmendment @ESOTERICshade - see parent for my sense of what would need to be covered to get an adrenochrome post over the bar of Crensch, VSD and MF.
Also, here are a couple more interesting links to pursue:
Adrenochrome and related oxidative metabolites of catecholamines: Effects on dopamine neurons and receptor binding profiles, Schizophrenia Research, December 2011, Volume 133, Issues 1-3, Pages 264–265
NIH ToxNet Toxicology Data Network ChemIDplus
Adrenochrome: The Vaults of Erowid
jangles ago
thanks, you truly have great character, I want to thank you for your commitment , assistance, and sensible logic.
Vindicator ago
You are welcome, jangles. :-) I'd upvoat you, but...DOH!...this is a deleted thread! :-)