Ok I’ll give it to you. . Mr Cormier was a tech, not a coroner. I said “testify”, ie assert. You are a legalistic idiot, which means you can only read facts, very much like a computer. You have NO intelligence.
I’ve been reading your assertions for awhile. You get your kicks from disputing in a legalistic manner, very much like Satan. You may be correct, but you have NO heart.
view the rest of the comments →
Justice4thekids ago
I'm sure he was.
Are_we__sure ago
The problem with this is that Andrew Breitbart died of natural causes
4warned ago
Too bad the coroner was poisoned what arsenic before he was able to testify on Breitbart cause of death.
Are_we__sure ago
No. That person was not involved in Breitbarts autopsy in any way AND WAS NOT a coroner.
And testify? Hilarious, you're confusing your conspiracy theories. Nobody was scheduled to testify about Breibart's death.
4warned ago
Ok I’ll give it to you. . Mr Cormier was a tech, not a coroner. I said “testify”, ie assert. You are a legalistic idiot, which means you can only read facts, very much like a computer. You have NO intelligence. I’ve been reading your assertions for awhile. You get your kicks from disputing in a legalistic manner, very much like Satan. You may be correct, but you have NO heart.
Are_we__sure ago
Yes, not only was he only a tech, he had nothing at all to with breitbart's autopsy.
You're still completely wrong about assert too. As Breitbart's autopsy report was completed.