Relevancy: Laura Loomer is a self-described independent journalist who is pushed herself into the center of #pizzagate. She's involved herself in the LV shooting and Paddock, issuing forth statements that it wasn't only Paddock involved and sometimes seeming to doubt that he was the shooter. Paddock was being investigated for human trafficking so in advancing theories, she's giving a pass to someone who was pretty damn scummy and diverting attention elsewhere.
I had a conversation with someone a few months back. It was with someone in the media. I brought up Laura Loomer, and their response was "no one gets that lucky all the time." I was like, "What the hell are you talking about?" They answered, "The evidence that falls into her lap. That doesn't happen without someone feeding those things to her." I asked, "Like who?" The response? "The CIA."
Ever since that conversation, I've been following her and noticing she does get a of things handed to her. Even finds trajectory sites. Really? Then there's Campos not being licensed and having a shared SSN number, a receipt for valet parking, a receipt for lunch showing two people ordered, videos of dead men in the lobby. You name it and she has it. And now she gets her hands on a Joe Barton video? That she passes onto shill AJ for immediate posting? And covers her ass with a breezy tweet:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:eGeyc0CxtGwJ:https://www.infowars.com/exclusive-video-of-rep-joe-barton-masturbating/+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Laura Loomer @LauraLoomer
I've given video footage of @RepJoeBarton to @infowars.
Let it be known that MORE than just a d**k pic exists. I didn't want to post the video online until we learn more about the details of his text exchange (it could be consensual) but the vid is now in @RealAlexJones's hands.
3:52 PM - Nov 22, 2017 · New York, USA
Don't actual journalists take the extra step of verifying whether a relationship was consensual before passing on what could be revenge porn? But she didn't do that. And she has absolutely no fear of reprisals. Why? Why is that? She has no fear in confronting Killary or shouting in press conferences and she passes on the video knowing it will be posted and covers her ass with this disingenuous note? It's all of the above that makes what the media person said echo in my head and I start to believe what was said.
Nothing else makes sense. I mean, why would a "journalist" do that? She more than proves Barton was set up, targeted, wouldn't play ball by going along with an agenda. That made him "expendable" and an embarrassment for the GOP. In using the blackmail in this way, it brushes the GOP with the same tar uncovered about Killary and is an effective tool in CNN and Joe Scarborough calling out the GOP as the party of pedophiles even though there was no pedophilia involved. Yes, the pic and video are already being equated with what Weiner did? Weiner was guilty of sending pics and sexting A MINOR! She was fifteen-years-old. He texted things like:
http://www.newsweek.com/anthony-weiner-sexting-jail-21-months-670539
he'd "bust that tight pussy so hard and so often."
Joe Barton had a consensual sexual relationship with an adult. What consensual adults do is their business and has nothing whatever to do with a grown man grooming a child by sexting and sending disturbing imagery, but that doesn't matter. What matters is that a member of the GOP is shamed, Loomer gets the notoriety and positions herself as someone willing to take down members of both parties, and AJ? AJ gets to disseminate "revenge porn" and get even more followers who love salacious material.
So I'm thinking think Loomer is not to be trusted. As I said I do follow her. I didn't quite believe what the inside source said, but now? That dead man in the lobby of the LV hotel was so amateurish. It was so blurry as to be unrecognizable, and plus there was no time stamp. None! How is anyone can to verify when it was taken? Plus it was so shaky that it seemed purposeful. Nobody is that bad of a video taker. Not with self-adjusting settings. And the attention off Paddock, shouldn't she have delved into his girlfriend and what was going on in the Philippines?
Questions ... questions ... questions ... anyway just posting my thoughts on this.
view the rest of the comments →
new4now ago
When I put my views on Corey Feldman up, a lot of people didnt like it, still don't
I had more then a feeling, and put up links
Don't know how these people feel now, but I stand firm on this
You don't like what a poster is saying , you have 2 choices
1.. debunk with proof
Personally will watch this story line, it's getting interesting
Didn't think of looking into her, but might just do that
She has theories with some proof behind some of it
Is she any different then we Are?
Yea, she has herself a you tube channel
Bold yes, is she protected? Interesting thought to play around with
I personally need a break every now and again from the crimes against children
That stuff breaks me hard, but will keep at it until it's non stop in the news and high level arrests are made, and even then wont stop :)
We should all be suspicious of stuff
There's a suppression of truth out there
I thought that's why we here?
Don't like what I say, that's fine, Dont want everyone agreeing with me, I'm not all knowing and maybe I missed some stuff, but if it's my opinion you have trouble with, tough shit
migratorypatterns ago
My opinion on Feldman did a 180. Used to defend him, but no more. He's part of the problem. All people had to do is show me that he denied there was a pizzagate? WHAT?!!!! To top if off posted about Corey's Angels. The two combined were enough. I feel it's important to speak out. Like this media person did with. I wasn't particularly receptive to what was said, but s/he was right.
new4now ago
We are all different, we have different buttons
Was just making a point, I put enough links up lol, still took awhile and there are still people who believe him
That's ok, one step at a time