Relevancy: Laura Loomer is a self-described independent journalist who is pushed herself into the center of #pizzagate. She's involved herself in the LV shooting and Paddock, issuing forth statements that it wasn't only Paddock involved and sometimes seeming to doubt that he was the shooter. Paddock was being investigated for human trafficking so in advancing theories, she's giving a pass to someone who was pretty damn scummy and diverting attention elsewhere.
I had a conversation with someone a few months back. It was with someone in the media. I brought up Laura Loomer, and their response was "no one gets that lucky all the time." I was like, "What the hell are you talking about?" They answered, "The evidence that falls into her lap. That doesn't happen without someone feeding those things to her." I asked, "Like who?" The response? "The CIA."
Ever since that conversation, I've been following her and noticing she does get a of things handed to her. Even finds trajectory sites. Really? Then there's Campos not being licensed and having a shared SSN number, a receipt for valet parking, a receipt for lunch showing two people ordered, videos of dead men in the lobby. You name it and she has it. And now she gets her hands on a Joe Barton video? That she passes onto shill AJ for immediate posting? And covers her ass with a breezy tweet:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:eGeyc0CxtGwJ:https://www.infowars.com/exclusive-video-of-rep-joe-barton-masturbating/+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Laura Loomer @LauraLoomer
I've given video footage of @RepJoeBarton to @infowars.
Let it be known that MORE than just a d**k pic exists. I didn't want to post the video online until we learn more about the details of his text exchange (it could be consensual) but the vid is now in @RealAlexJones's hands.
3:52 PM - Nov 22, 2017 · New York, USA
Don't actual journalists take the extra step of verifying whether a relationship was consensual before passing on what could be revenge porn? But she didn't do that. And she has absolutely no fear of reprisals. Why? Why is that? She has no fear in confronting Killary or shouting in press conferences and she passes on the video knowing it will be posted and covers her ass with this disingenuous note? It's all of the above that makes what the media person said echo in my head and I start to believe what was said.
Nothing else makes sense. I mean, why would a "journalist" do that? She more than proves Barton was set up, targeted, wouldn't play ball by going along with an agenda. That made him "expendable" and an embarrassment for the GOP. In using the blackmail in this way, it brushes the GOP with the same tar uncovered about Killary and is an effective tool in CNN and Joe Scarborough calling out the GOP as the party of pedophiles even though there was no pedophilia involved. Yes, the pic and video are already being equated with what Weiner did? Weiner was guilty of sending pics and sexting A MINOR! She was fifteen-years-old. He texted things like:
http://www.newsweek.com/anthony-weiner-sexting-jail-21-months-670539
he'd "bust that tight pussy so hard and so often."
Joe Barton had a consensual sexual relationship with an adult. What consensual adults do is their business and has nothing whatever to do with a grown man grooming a child by sexting and sending disturbing imagery, but that doesn't matter. What matters is that a member of the GOP is shamed, Loomer gets the notoriety and positions herself as someone willing to take down members of both parties, and AJ? AJ gets to disseminate "revenge porn" and get even more followers who love salacious material.
So I'm thinking think Loomer is not to be trusted. As I said I do follow her. I didn't quite believe what the inside source said, but now? That dead man in the lobby of the LV hotel was so amateurish. It was so blurry as to be unrecognizable, and plus there was no time stamp. None! How is anyone can to verify when it was taken? Plus it was so shaky that it seemed purposeful. Nobody is that bad of a video taker. Not with self-adjusting settings. And the attention off Paddock, shouldn't she have delved into his girlfriend and what was going on in the Philippines?
Questions ... questions ... questions ... anyway just posting my thoughts on this.
view the rest of the comments →
Lrusc ago
I know it is a matter of semantics. I don't think she is a CIA who came up "through the ranks."
But she could be a CIA asset.
migratorypatterns ago
Yes, that's exactly what was implied.
Her fearless determination is because she's well-protected.
new4now ago
Could be Mob
migratorypatterns ago
Could be.
Think the CIA makes more sense since she's involved in more than just LV. Plus she's so certain this evidence she finds is right. Usually it takes time to authenticate, but she just gets it and publishes it ... no time to really do an in-depth check. It probably means somebody already has and when she gets her hands on it, it's just hit "PUBLISH".
It's the easy-peasy school of journalism.
new4now ago
Does the Mob still own Las Vegas?
Do you really think they dont know what going on?
I tend to lean CIA, until other stuff comes out
A lot of agents start with journalism, or some other shit
Makes me go hmmmm. :)
migratorypatterns ago
Yes, the mob is still in Vegas, but there are international heavy hitters like the Saudis, etc.
new4now ago
Ahhh, they still Italian There? The Mob?
Lol