The best interest of the children or human trafficking? Arizona court declares it appears being "adoptable" is the only reason State took children from their mother

The best interest of the children or human trafficking? Arizona court declares it appears being "adoptable" is the only reason State took children from their mother (pizzagate)

submitted 7.4 years ago by Factfinder2

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2017/11/20/untethered-evidence-court-reverses-department-child-safety-case-cut-mom-off-kids/868995001/

From the article:

In a rare move, the state Court of Appeals has reversed a decision that severed a mother's rights to her two children, saying state child-welfare workers presented a case "not sufficiently rooted in the evidence."… Writing for the three-judge panel, Acting Presiding Judge Peter B. Swann concluded there appeared to be only one motive to separate the mother from her kids: that the children were adoptable...The other judges, who joined in Swann's conclusions, were Michael J. Brown and Patricia A. Orozco."

https://medicalkidnap.com/2017/11/21/arizona-judge-child-removed-from-home-illegally-only-reason-was-child-was-adoptable/

From the article:

“There is a great deal of federal funding in adopting out children to strangers; thus, children have literally become a commodity to be seized and sold. In any other context, this would be considered human trafficking. In the context of Child Protective Services, it is considered “in the best interest of the child.”

Full text of the court’s ruling: http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2017/1%20CA-JV%2016-0497.pdf