"This is all fake news. There are no indictments". Wtf? I thought it had been proven without the shadow of a doubt that there WERE an enormous amount of indictments?
The future will tell us if he was right or wrong. Personally I like Cernovich but I think he is hyping his own story (conyers) a bit too much, calling it no less than "the biggest story of 2017". Perhaps that it's the reason he wants to downplay everything else?
I agree, @newworldahead. I think Cernovich has done some good, for sure, but I actually stumbled across his live "Periscope" presentation last night and watched it. He was drinking wine and promoting himself to a nauseating degree. He should have just kept his mouth shut but, instead, he pontificated about what a vital piece of the puzzle he is, how great he is, and how important he is. He also was reading off the donations that people were making to him, in real time.
He'd say stuff like, "I'm the newest and best thing in the media -- thanks for the $75 dollars, Janet." He was revolting as he did that, in my humble opinion. I found it very unprofessional and child-like, and it was a huge turnoff.
Me? I'll take what I like and leave the rest, as they say. Some of what he does is good. But in other ways he's an immature, unprofessional, childish egomaniac, and therefore I have to take whatever he says with a nugget of salt.
Sadly, I believe Cerno. Mueller doesn't have anything. I don't really know how to confirm all the sealed indictments for myself, but I believe they're real. So the indictments must be for something big. I think the story he broke is very big, since it implies the over 230 other deals have not be publicized. But he definitely wants to downgrade everything else as well cuz he wants his story to last. And now that Conyers is denying all the allegations, the story will run longer.
But try and deny the momentum that is being created within the public towards these indictments and the backlash that will occur if Hillary and other obvious criminals are not included.
Are you hoping her name is not in there ? Of course you are.
But try and deny the momentum that is being created within the public towards these indictments and the backlash that will occur if Hillary and other obvious criminals are not included.
what are you talking about? Momentum? You mean people getting excited over LARPers?
The Public? Y'all think you represent the public? The public is not aware of this LARP in any way.
Who are going to backlash against? 4 chan?
I know her name is not in there, because this is all make believe intended to muddy the waters about the real Mueller investigation. Tony Podesta make face a FARA charge, but there's no investigation of Hillary going on.
No indictments "coming on Hillary." There are a bunch of a number of sealed indictments that currently exist. But there's no evidence yet of who they apply to. All this talk started popping up once it was revealed that Mueller indicted George Papadopolous but kept his indictment sealed until Manafort and Gates were served with their indictments. Then people went on an indictment hunt.
view the rest of the comments →
newworldahead ago
"This is all fake news. There are no indictments". Wtf? I thought it had been proven without the shadow of a doubt that there WERE an enormous amount of indictments?
crashing_this_thread ago
There is a shitload of indictments, but we don't know for who.
Gothamgirl ago
Same here.
YesImAnAddict ago
Here is the google drive folder of all the "confirmed" sealed indictments. 1428 sealed indictments at the moment. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15579P4VztZO0aNvejJasb1yOvXUCp3vS/view Not sure what to think. I guess he is saying no indictments for the Clintons...
newworldahead ago
The future will tell us if he was right or wrong. Personally I like Cernovich but I think he is hyping his own story (conyers) a bit too much, calling it no less than "the biggest story of 2017". Perhaps that it's the reason he wants to downplay everything else?
SecondAmendment ago
I agree, @newworldahead. I think Cernovich has done some good, for sure, but I actually stumbled across his live "Periscope" presentation last night and watched it. He was drinking wine and promoting himself to a nauseating degree. He should have just kept his mouth shut but, instead, he pontificated about what a vital piece of the puzzle he is, how great he is, and how important he is. He also was reading off the donations that people were making to him, in real time.
He'd say stuff like, "I'm the newest and best thing in the media -- thanks for the $75 dollars, Janet." He was revolting as he did that, in my humble opinion. I found it very unprofessional and child-like, and it was a huge turnoff.
Me? I'll take what I like and leave the rest, as they say. Some of what he does is good. But in other ways he's an immature, unprofessional, childish egomaniac, and therefore I have to take whatever he says with a nugget of salt.
YesImAnAddict ago
Sadly, I believe Cerno. Mueller doesn't have anything. I don't really know how to confirm all the sealed indictments for myself, but I believe they're real. So the indictments must be for something big. I think the story he broke is very big, since it implies the over 230 other deals have not be publicized. But he definitely wants to downgrade everything else as well cuz he wants his story to last. And now that Conyers is denying all the allegations, the story will run longer.
Are_we_sure ago
There's zero evidence that any pending indictments relate to Clinton.
Oh_Well_ian ago
no shit.. they're sealed
But try and deny the momentum that is being created within the public towards these indictments and the backlash that will occur if Hillary and other obvious criminals are not included.
Are you hoping her name is not in there ? Of course you are.
Are_we__sure ago
what are you talking about? Momentum? You mean people getting excited over LARPers? The Public? Y'all think you represent the public? The public is not aware of this LARP in any way.
Who are going to backlash against? 4 chan?
I know her name is not in there, because this is all make believe intended to muddy the waters about the real Mueller investigation. Tony Podesta make face a FARA charge, but there's no investigation of Hillary going on.
newworldahead ago
But he just said there were no indictments. That sounded kind of funny.
Are_we_sure ago
No indictments "coming on Hillary." There are a bunch of a number of sealed indictments that currently exist. But there's no evidence yet of who they apply to. All this talk started popping up once it was revealed that Mueller indicted George Papadopolous but kept his indictment sealed until Manafort and Gates were served with their indictments. Then people went on an indictment hunt.