While most of Q's offerings align with what researchers here have found over the past year -- there are things that don't jibe.

I thought it would be helpful to take a moment to think on those things Q and other high-ranking anons are saying that don't ring true for each of us, and compile them so we can review, see what others are thinking, and hopefully edge out of any groupthink and/or confirmatory bias that might have swept us up in the excitement.

Three things off the top of my head:

The Las Vegas narrative they offered seems even more far-fetched than anything that's come out of LVSO and the FBI so far.

The Saudis-afraid-of-fracking narrative seems similarly far-fetched. And Clinton was NOT going to stop fracking if she'd been elected.

The Saudi-Rothchild-Soros triangle is, as we know, over-simplistic and misdirectional.

Pizzagate related because if we're being intentionally led off track, we need to regroup and refocus on our purpose here. If everything looks fine after we calmly review it, then we can more forward with more confidence.