While most of Q's offerings align with what researchers here have found over the past year -- there are things that don't jibe.
I thought it would be helpful to take a moment to think on those things Q and other high-ranking anons are saying that don't ring true for each of us, and compile them so we can review, see what others are thinking, and hopefully edge out of any groupthink and/or confirmatory bias that might have swept us up in the excitement.
Three things off the top of my head:
The Las Vegas narrative they offered seems even more far-fetched than anything that's come out of LVSO and the FBI so far.
The Saudis-afraid-of-fracking narrative seems similarly far-fetched. And Clinton was NOT going to stop fracking if she'd been elected.
The Saudi-Rothchild-Soros triangle is, as we know, over-simplistic and misdirectional.
Pizzagate related because if we're being intentionally led off track, we need to regroup and refocus on our purpose here. If everything looks fine after we calmly review it, then we can more forward with more confidence.
view the rest of the comments →
angelafogo ago
Not only it works to divert attention to led us off track but also it helps to divide us between those naive enough to believe him and those who just know he is not giving helpful information.
He just revealed that the white rabbit is Playboy. Can you think of a good reason why he did not said so from the beginning? The guy is playing games and feeding riddles. That is (((them)))
chabon ago
Was that the big reveal? I only skimmed this morning's post. If so, then all the researchers truly are being driven into a box canyon.
ESOTERICshade ago
That was as good as "the bad Saudis" got arrested. All the Saudi Princes are savages.
chabon ago
This. This is also exactly (((them))).