You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VIrginiaPerson ago

I saw someone comment somewhere else (then I lost it) that it would be a good idea for anyone with old issues to look back through the articles to see if anything of note is there.

A thought of my own is that such magazines might have been a way to subvert young minds. The kids sneak the magazines, see their first sexual images, then that could get tied to whatever is next to them? Trigger words, items, ideas?

patriot_biz ago

I don't think that "mind control" really works like that. I mean it's pretty clear that our government has developed some means to manipulate people into behaving weirdly, but in practice I think what they do is they run a false flag on someone who is already impressionable with a combination of drugs and bullying. And then they roll the dice. It's not like your brain has some secret receptors in it that I can "hack" or something to make you begin behaving like a robot. Can you bully people? Obviously. Manipulate people? Absolutely. But it would be difficult to get a reliable agent to go against his instincts, against his family, against his country. "Brainwashed people", and that's a terrible word for it, are unpredictable.
My point is that I don't think that this works the way that you think it does.

Tyranny-News-Network ago

For the first 40 years of my 48 year life I believed what you've stated, essentially. And I've followed very fringe topics for many years.

Then I was sent "Operation Mind Control" by Walter Bowart. Springmeir had piqued my curiosity after explicitly detailing the many dozens of layers of alters in a single person and the complex relationships between each. But I doubted that such tight control and regulation of consciousness and memory could be possible. But after the Bowart book and a friend explaining that mind control war largely simple hypnosis, I changed my mind.

The final barrier for you may be related to your view of what "susceptible" to hypnosis really means. I heard one hypnotist describe how he often speaks to people who think they aren't good candidates. He said, as he talks them through why their technique doesn't work, they become deeply hypnotized.

When you hear me say "dolphin popcorn" you will awaken and have no memory of this conversation. Really? Is it that simple? Apparently so, with a little bit of other knowledge. Something to think about.

Votescam ago

Tyranny --

Hadn't heard of the Bowart book -- but on the internet you will find Operation Mockingbird ... and there are two other Operations which worked with it ... Operation Paperclip (200,000 ex-Nazis used to found the CIA, funneled into the FBI and other government agencies and to "hot spots" around the world to ensure the rise of the Fourth Reich), and Operation Gladio which would ensure that only right wing governments would rise and control government in nations over which the US had influence and control after WWII -- i.e., France, Italy, Germany, Japan. In Italy, the US actually resurrected the Mafia in order to ensure the plan was carried out properly.

If you're here, I'm sure you're familiar with CIAs MKULTRA ... but I would suspect that TORTURE became recognized as the way to create new personalities based in information gained by the Catholic Church/Vatican over the long history of their 'Crusades" and "The Inquistion" and the "Hammer of Witches."
The Vatican would have passed this information on to the Third Reich and Elites. Organized patriarchal religions underpin Elite Patriarchy. In turn the Nazis would have passed this info on to the OSS/CIA. Pope Pius XII actually catapulted Hitler to power. However, it was American Elites and International Elites who recruited Hitler -- from what I've read from a brothel where he was a homosexual prostitute.
And, again, we see that Hitler was also severe beaten by his father as a child. These are the kinds of men recruited by Elites.

Re HYPNOSIS .... It would be impossible to argue that hypnosis hasn't been made a TABOO subject in the US. Rarely mentioned or discussed any longer.

From what I've read ... Sigmund Freud's original method of the "talking therapy" was to hypnotise the patient. However, as he began to recruit followers who would carry on the profession of psychiatry, it turned out that a good number of them were unable to hypnotize their patients. Therefore, hypnotism was removed as a necessity for a psychiatrist to be able to perform. Interestingly, we still see some of this in old movies -- dramas and comedies -- one of these was SPELLBOUND (1945) where near the end you see Peck being hypnotized.

Mind Control isn't simple hypnosis. In order to create "disassociation" or split personalities, trauma seems to be necessary -- not only to initiate the split personalities but to maintain them. You'll find some of the answers in Operation MKULTRA by Wiki. Also note that the Host is generally unaware of the other personalities or what they are doing. CIA used young children for homosexual prostitution, drug running, and for espionage/spying-blackmail. This was all funded by Congress.

Many people who are aware of the splitting of personalities don't know that the new personalities can also be programmed -- to speak a different language, and/or with photographic memories. Presumably with other talents?

This is about Mind Control over populations ... it doesn't begin and end with Mind Control over one individual -- or a few Manchurian Candidates.

ESOTERICshade ago

Organized patriarchal religions underpin Elite Patriarchy.

Who writes the cointelpro/Mockingbird scripts you bring here? God Damn I can't stand you people.

Votescam ago

Hard to tell just why truth about our government and the Vatican/male-dominated religion bothers you so much.

ESOTERICshade ago

Hard to tell just why truth about our government and Vatican's male-supremacist religion bothers you so much.

It does not but you do because you are a designated family wrecker. Its your job. Its what you do. Your side of the fence seeks to intentionally destroy the nuclear family and all that is cohesive and nurturing in the societies of "others." I have you pegged like a nail. I know exactly what you are.

Votescam ago

By standing against sexual perversion and CIA MKULTRA, you fantasize that I'm a family wrecker. Get help.

ESOTERICshade ago

By standing against sexual perversion and CIA MKULTRA, you fantasize that I'm a family wrecker. Get help.

That is one of the topics you use in an effort to blend in just before you start slipping in your anti-family divide men and women strategies. I got you down pat. You don't even feel bad about it. You probably laugh at the misery you cause.

Votescam ago

In order for parents to protect their children, they have to know just who the sexual abusers of children are -- and historically they are males ... INCEST is one of the oldest crimes committed by fathers, grandfathers, uncles, male cousins -- and male friends of the family.

Maybe you prefer that society not know who the sexual abusers of children are?

Again ... get some help.

ESOTERICshade ago

Women are also some of the worst child abusers on earth themselves. There are millions of people who have survived their mother's narcissistic beatings and wrath. You never mention that though. You just want to start a division between men and women.

Votescam ago

Women will abuse children, especially when they are under the influence of a heterosexual male. But both women and children are abused in just about every way by males in our society. HOWEVER, statistics show that MALES are our sexual abusers of children.

Meanwhile, increasing poverty in the US and rising unemployment among "whites" and AA's in the US -- destruction of the Middle Class -- exists because of the corruption of our government and the greed of Elites/corporations.

That's why we are losing the Middle Class, for one -- for another Elites no longer needed a Middle Class as propaganda against Russian communism since the Wall fell. Elites have stopped funding a Middle Class here.

Votescam ago

This looks like a ton of white propaganda ...

“We cannot be sure that the position of the earliest Africans differed markedly from that of the white indentured servants. The debate has considerable significance for the interpretation of race relations in American history” (Eugene D. Genovese, Roll, Jordan Roll: The World the Slaves Made, p. 31 ).

And this from your link tends to support that conclusion ...

Most of the books on White labor in early America are titled with words like “White indentured servitude,” White “bondservants,” White “servants” etc. It is interesting that White people who were bound to a condition of what became in many cases permanent chattel slavery unto death, are not referred to as slaves by Establishment academics.

They are not referred to as "slaves" because the conditions were markedly different. Bondage isn't the total slavery endured by Africans enslaved here. And "Indentured Servitude" and "Servant" make that quite clear.

ESOTERICshade ago

This looks like a ton of white propaganda ...

You failed to take the burden off the WHITE man for black slavery. The white man didn't do that. The Jewish merchants in Newport did that and they also owned the liquor and gunpowder businesses. Why don't you ever talk about that?