You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Eggs-Vs-Bacon ago

This article missed the mark if the connection between Boeing/Mostyn/Hillary was the Russia deal. It was the SAUDI deal during the same year, 2010.

The Podesta-Clinton-Saudi connection should be seen in light of the recent media exposes revealing the taudry pay-to-play nature of the Clinton Foundation. Top on the list of foreign donors to the foundation is Saudi Arabia, which contributed between $10 million and $25 million. What did the Saudis get for their largesse and access? Wikileaks revealed a 2009 cable by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying: “More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Lashkar e-Tayyiba and other terrorist groups.” Instead of sanctioning the Saudis, Clinton did the opposite: She authorized enormous quantities of weapons to be sold to them. On Christmas Eve in 2011, Hillary Clinton and her closest aides celebrated a massive $29.4 billion sale to the Saudis of over 80 F-15 fighter jets, manufactured by Boeing, a company which coincidentally contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation. In a chain of enthusiastic emails, an aide exclaimed that it was “not a bad Christmas present.” I’m sure the Yemenis at the receiving end of the Saudi bombings would not be so enthusiastic.>

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/medea-benjamin/hillary-clinton-the-podes_b_11779826.html

Also in 2010, Boeing made a $2m "donation" to the world's fair in China at Hillary's behest, donated $1m to the CF for a Haiti Childen's fund and wrangled some high speaking fees for Bill Clinton. All pay for play.

Boeing is the key here folks if anyone wants to do some digging. I'm guessing its the Mostyn/Keating connection.

argosciv ago

Interesting that you copped a downvoat here... almost like someone doesn't want you blaiming Saud, but, would rather you blame another group...

micha_ ago

I remember when the theory was discussed, that the buildings around Comet Ping Pong were Saudi owned. Censorship here went beserk...

argosciv ago

The more I think about it, the more it's been staring me in the face the whole fuckin time... My research touched on it in it's earliest days xD

micha_ ago

Yes, it was suspicious, that the most absurd theories were allowed and even promoted, while any mentioning of the Saudis was ridiculed. But if we think about it, it is totally logical. Saudis = big money. And the deep blackmail state is working FOR, not against the big (money) powers.

Make sure to read the current Playboy/Hefner topic which brings up excellent questions about the Saudis/Twitter/US-Tech/CIA.

argosciv ago

Yes, it was suspicious, that the most absurd theories were allowed and even promoted, while any mentioning of the Saudis was ridiculed. But if we think about it, it is totally logical.

Yes, but, not necessarily for the reason you stipulated...

Oh wait, you said ridiculed... yes, ridiculed by shills, but, also by people who genuinely weren't able to believe it or who were otherwise being swayed by shills - yes, shilling for the worldfuckers/Saud. Something to also understand though, is that nobody was able to paint a picture as to the motive and means Saud might have; it's a sensitive topic and without all the pieces, easily prone to attack; as such, mods were doing the right thing by allowing other threads to stay up while removing Saud related threads in the early days...

The work everyone has done over the last year, has built one hell of a case, that's for damn sure... it just so happens that it all ties right back to The House of Saud.

Saudis/Twitter/US-Tech/CIA

Already aware :)