You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Eggs-Vs-Bacon ago

This wasn’t the first time the Clinton and Mostyns found themselves being questioned over unethical practices. In 2010, Hillary Clinton’s State Department pushed through a multi-billion dollar deal for Boeing in Russia, and just two months later the company gave nearly a million dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Just a short time later, Boeing’s top lobbyist and former Bill Clinton aide Tim Keating partnered with Mr. Mostyn’s Super PAC to do a joint fundraising venture for Hillary’s planned presidential campaign.>

OK does anyone know how Boeing/Russia ties into Mostyn?

Because I was literally just researching this $60 billion deal that Obama/Hillary made in 2010 with Boeing/Saudi Arabia - the biggest arms deal in US history at the time. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/13/us-saudi-arabia-arms-deal

I need to dig up some strange information I found about the Saudi's and Boeing but I can't remember the former Boeing employees name at the moment. He came into my line of vision during the KSA purge.

Anyway, I can't find why Mostyn is associated with Boeing. Anyone have info?

carmencita ago

Whoa. That was the exact paragraph that jumped out at me too. The joke is that they are so busy trying to pin Russia on just anybody right now, when it is staring them right in the face. HRC. Hillary and Russia. Uranium and now Boeing. Really. They are trying to stuff it back in the box, but it is just too big.

TrishaUK ago

Even we here in the UK are getting on the band wagon of 'THE RUSSIANS DID IT!' Unbelieavable. Last week Theresa May made sure she got ahead of ANY of the photographic evidence coming out, by preparing Britain with the 'Russian Fake News' that Hillary Clinton is STILL harping on about even though it has been proven that Russia did nothing over there in the Trump case! DISGUSTING! I reckon that she knows all this photographic truth is going to be released and has planted the thought to the public of the UK that
1. Its the Russians and 2. The proof will be photo shopped. So sadly she, in my opinion, has been compromised by the Clinton thing too and is trying hard to back them up.
I almost shouted at the tv when I heard her say this, this week (watch video) 😢 https://www.rt.com/uk/409837-may-russia-banquet-meddling/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Eggs-Vs-Bacon ago

@trishaUK as soon as I heard about "possible Russian photoshopping of politicians doing very naughty things" I was CERTAIN it was a pre-emptive strike to be used as an excuse once photos start surfacing. I'm thinking that whatever photographic evidence was held to blackmail people will start to be released.

And I'm starting to think that the whole new "sexual assault" narrative is meant to break the public in for the worse things that are coming.

ESOTERICshade ago

And I'm starting to think that the whole new "sexual assault" narrative is meant to break the public in for the worse things that are coming.

I understand the thought but I have never bought the "we need to break in the delicate public" strategy. They don't care if the public is shocked by child trafficking. As a matter of fact they probably want the public to be shocked about it because it generates support for the prosecution of the perps. Conditioning the public is done daily by the perps for their evil purposes but for exposing criminals the whole idea of conditioning the delicate public before exposing criminals just does not seem like something that would even fit into the process.

The "good guys" would have to be firmly in control and have already won in order to mish mash around with time frames just to soothe the delicate feelings of the public. Not buying it.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon ago

Good points... but it's not just the "good guys" who would see a benefit for conditioning the public. Actually the greater benefit is to the bad guys, who can claim it's fake news, bandwaggoning, photoshopping, the Russians...

The created the term "fake news" just for pizzagate, after all. :D

ESOTERICshade ago

Actually the greater benefit is to the bad guys, who can claim it's fake news, bandwaggoning, photoshopping, the Russians...

Absolutely. For some reason people are suddenly underestimating the perp's propensity for creating grand narratives and I'm not sure why people bought this. Actually i'm not so sure as many people are buying it as it seems.

We have a new fleet of E-Celeb people that came with it like Liz Crokin, Trazy Beanz, and a slew of others. Convincing people that "everbody else believes it" is a perp specialty game too.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon ago

You bring up a couple of people that very suddenly came into my line of vision as soon as Qanon appeared on the scene, I mean like immediately, I'd never heard of either of them. Both are a bit on the edge IMO, I watched some podcasts and... I dunno. Not the most level-headed voices TBH. Imperator Rex and Thomas Wictor are two others, and although they creep into tinfoil territory a bit, their presentation is more grounded.

You're 100% on why I'm leary of Liz and Beanz. There is way too much presenting gossip as fact and inflating isolated things to gargantuan proportions.

ESOTERICshade ago

.>You're 100% on why I'm leary of Liz and Beanz. There is way too much presenting gossip as fact and inflating isolated things to gargantuan proportions.

Absolutely. Why would anybody believe these Twitter queens? So far all I hear is "oh I like them." I bet. They say what people want to hear.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon ago

Did you run by the rumor over at 4c that one of the QLarpers was Beanz? For the record, I think some of the Q stuff is legit, but this one rang true to me, and it seems like her MO.