The victim's testimony is the evidence. If you don't feel comfortable accepting this as a minimum standard of evidence, that is certainly your right. I am not the only person making these kinds of claims against HRC, and my encounter with HRC is but one event in 35 years of abuse, as I am a daughter of this cult that is perpetrating against children and committing human sacrifice. If you would like to read more of my personal account with respect to my entire life, not just HRC, I invite you to review my Twitter timeline @SaRaAshcraft . I have no need to persuade you to believe me, and I hope that you and everyone else will do much more research and come to your own discerning conclusions about that you believe to be true.
Testimony alone is NOT PROOF of your story-
anyone can come here and make a claim,
without evidence the story is of little value to this research,
while we all make up our mind if we believe the story, we must have corroborating evidence before we can use the info-thank you
As a thought/question, does anyone here know what evidentiary standard has been used/required previously to convict anyone on charges about ritual abuse, mind control, or sexual abuse of a child after that child becomes an adult? I am aware that testimony from a forensic psychologist can be used, which I can certainly obtain. I think a lie detector test is also admissible in these instances, though not very strong.
I have my written accounts and drawings, which could be matched with people and places (hence external circumstantial evidence). The nature of repressed memories and dissociation/mind control makes my testimony and the patterns found within my reconstructed memories more than mere "because I said so" - there is an underlying thread of circumstances that can be corroborated externally (was this person in that city at this time, etc).
I haven't spoken to a lawyer, but the impression I have is that the testimony of a victim in my circumstance, if robust and detailed, IS in fact sufficient evidence to bring charges. Whether it would be enough to convict, I can't say. But I am not sure there is EVER external proof of these things in cases where the abuse happened 30 years prior. Does anyone here have any insight on this?
As I said before, I respect your personal standard of evidence and I do not challenge it or ask you to believe me. Requests to provide proof beyond stating my truth is a logical fallacy and I don't feel obligated to comply. I am doing what I feel is right and necessary to combat this evil. You can do as you wish.
view the rest of the comments →
sunajAeon ago
Can ANYONE on this board show ANY evidence of this claim? There is NO info so far to support this claim
SarahRuthAshcraft ago
The victim's testimony is the evidence. If you don't feel comfortable accepting this as a minimum standard of evidence, that is certainly your right. I am not the only person making these kinds of claims against HRC, and my encounter with HRC is but one event in 35 years of abuse, as I am a daughter of this cult that is perpetrating against children and committing human sacrifice. If you would like to read more of my personal account with respect to my entire life, not just HRC, I invite you to review my Twitter timeline @SaRaAshcraft . I have no need to persuade you to believe me, and I hope that you and everyone else will do much more research and come to your own discerning conclusions about that you believe to be true.
sunajAeon ago
Testimony alone is NOT PROOF of your story- anyone can come here and make a claim, without evidence the story is of little value to this research, while we all make up our mind if we believe the story, we must have corroborating evidence before we can use the info-thank you
SarahRuthAshcraft ago
As a thought/question, does anyone here know what evidentiary standard has been used/required previously to convict anyone on charges about ritual abuse, mind control, or sexual abuse of a child after that child becomes an adult? I am aware that testimony from a forensic psychologist can be used, which I can certainly obtain. I think a lie detector test is also admissible in these instances, though not very strong.
I have my written accounts and drawings, which could be matched with people and places (hence external circumstantial evidence). The nature of repressed memories and dissociation/mind control makes my testimony and the patterns found within my reconstructed memories more than mere "because I said so" - there is an underlying thread of circumstances that can be corroborated externally (was this person in that city at this time, etc).
I haven't spoken to a lawyer, but the impression I have is that the testimony of a victim in my circumstance, if robust and detailed, IS in fact sufficient evidence to bring charges. Whether it would be enough to convict, I can't say. But I am not sure there is EVER external proof of these things in cases where the abuse happened 30 years prior. Does anyone here have any insight on this?
SarahRuthAshcraft ago
As I said before, I respect your personal standard of evidence and I do not challenge it or ask you to believe me. Requests to provide proof beyond stating my truth is a logical fallacy and I don't feel obligated to comply. I am doing what I feel is right and necessary to combat this evil. You can do as you wish.