This isn't correct. If you read the preamble of the PDF analyzing the 2006 sealed dockets, you'll note that they completed their search in 2008. On page 3 they point out explicitly: “The research, therefore, reflects cases sealed approximately two years after filing.”

It is routine for courts to issue dockets which are sealed until the defendant is served or enters court. Those dockets then become unsealed. So you'll see a lot of sealed dockets if you look at filings from the last two weeks. If you examine these again in a month or two, most of them will be unsealed. In 2019 you may only find a few hundred sealed criminal indictments in the whole country for 2017. Ken White explains how normal this is in the tweets quoted here:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/28/16564100/mueller-investigation-sealed-indictments-explained

I have a question. I would have submitted to ask pizzagate but I don't have enough points.

You have spoken of all the indictments. Appreciated.

Today I heard that Jeff Sessions is complicit in Uranium One. Now

I don't know if that is true or not.

Question:Does Sessions have to approve all the indictments?

Do they have to originate in the DOJ and be signed by him?

Because of what I heard Jeff Sessions himself could be indicted.

Thank you if you can shed any light on this.

I had a look at this Google Drive file. First, a lot of the indictments contained in the files are not sealed as we can clearly see the name of the defender in the first column. I ran a google search on some of these names and at first glance these appear to be small fish.

Some of these thugs (Note that some mugshots and articles refer to PREVIOUS arrests)

Morgan Stephen Poole

Charges: Not specified

URL: https://arkansas.arrests.org/Arrests/Morgan_Poole_19588588/

Genaro Wilson Martinez

Charges: RAPE / PERSON LESS THAN 14 YOA DISTR. POSS. VIEW. MATTER DEPICTING SEXUAL CONDUCT INVOLVING CHILD

URL: http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Arkansas/Crittenden-County-AR/Genaro-Wilson-Martinez.150726452.html

Juventino Juarez Cruz

Charges: Not specified

URL: http://jail.com/arrest-records/juventino-juarez-cruz-21209546

Franklin Paul Hill

Charges: printing and selling counterfeit money

URL: http://katv.com/news/local/benton-police-investigating-counterfeit-money-scheme

Robert Nathan Hensley

Charges: enticement of a minor and sexual exploitation of children

URL: http://m.arkansasonline.com/news/2017/nov/07/cabot-sex-offender-faces-enticement-oth/

Chandler Leniu and Marlene Wickam

Charges: Planning bank robbery

URL: http://www.dailybreeze.com/2017/10/17/fbi-affidavit-details-how-former-football-star-and-girlfriend-planned-torrance-bank-job/

Adis Soltanian

Charges: unlawful use of willfully obtained personal identifying information

URL: https://www.localcrimenews.com/welcome/detail/20397231

Jose Antonio Ramirez Jr. and Angelique Ugalde Ramirez

Charges: suspicion of felony charges of unauthorized use of personal identification to obtain credit, forgery, conspiracy, possession of stolen property and child endangerment

url: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/crime/article39512709.html

@lawyer4justice: I'm unstickying this for now to put up a different sticky. Please ping me if you update this with further research, or make a new post with further research. Thanks!

After @damartin32 posted the info about 832 sealed indictments, he searched more Federal District Courts, and he is up to 1428 sealed indictments in 50 of the districts, with 44 remaining to search. There is a PDF showing the indictments when he was at the 832 stage. It is available online here:

Pacer Printout of the 832 Sealed Indictments https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ybqDYsLxNnkKNEypjHfuzZuXEo1WbIKd/view

Now, he stopped printing to PDF and is just keeping a spreadsheet and adding the number per district: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15579P4VztZO0aNvejJasb1yOvXUCp3vS/view

Next, he did a Deep Dive and and searched other things, like sealed search warrants, etc, starting Oct 1st through November 18th.

Hope this helps.

Probably Relevant To Us Seeking Truth Going Forward:

OP @DietCokehead1. Thank You.

https://voat.co/v/news/2248689

Hey OP.
When the indictments are going to be unsealed, I'm interested in the statistics of
the defendants ethnicity, specifically, how many of the defendants are jewish (or have an Israeli citizenship).

Do you think you could source something like this, perhaps with the investigative help of the whole community?

Actually, looking at those cases... at your drive link, and maybe I'm missing something here, if so please assist, don't seem very sealed when you can look at them... the Los Angeles ones seem to be mostly search warrants, including electronic devices, (18 U.S. Code § 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records.)

Sealed indictments opening! Former Procurement Officer at Federally Funded Nuclear R & D Facility Indicted on Wire Fraud, Major Fraud, & Money Laundering! First of 44 out of Albuquerque https://twitter.com/hashtag/FollowTheWhiteRabbit?src=hash FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, November 15, 2017 Former Procurement Officer at Federally Funded Nuclear Research and Development Facility Indicted on Charges of Wire Fraud, Major Fraud and Money Laundering

A federal grand jury sitting in the District of New Mexico returned an 11-count indictment against a former procurement officer employed at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), a nuclear research and development facility of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), for orchestrating a scheme to obtain a $2.3 million contract through fraudulent means. Acting Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Blanco of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division made the announcement. http://archive.is/HY9Is https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1011481/download

Does anyone know if these indictments have been ruled out as having to with the MS13 sweeps? Wouldn't the sweeps require indictments, as well, whether sealed or unsealed?

User damartin32 has been shadowbanned on Twitter. His profile still exists but, as a non-subscriber, I am unable to see their tweets in search in the tweets and people sections. I am sharing this for informational purposes only. I have been investigating Twitter algorithm trying to find out why Twitter will not show me James A D'Amore's tweets even though I am subscribed to him.

screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/iErok

lawyer4justice / lawyer4justice

Thank you again. How can we find out the date when they / any of them, will be UNsealed

I believe there is an error in the original post. The 832 represents 1/3 of the US district courts. They are listed on the front page of the google doc. if you do a search for Stormwatcher or @damartin32 on Twitter you'll find this guy who is counting them. He counted a handful more and found another 184, I think that is the number. Plus, the 832 does not include the 31 or 82 out off D.C. (Ive heard both numbers, and verified the 31. That was a week ago and it is very possible more have been added and that the 82 is correct. So the number counted for less than half the districts now stands at around 1000.

If I were preparing sealed indictments, I would not forget Dick Cheney and both Bushes.

I know you've heard this before Voaters.

Worth a repeat...

Our patience still needed I think.

Continue being a patient and wise as a serpent.

Be patiently

Great!.... HELPS ...non legal trained voater here.🙋 Upvote ☑

https://twitter.com/damartin32/status/930978421726957568

Sealed indictments up to 1,428 in 50 of 94 districts

Proof or lies.

Someone should order a Pacer Report and post it here for everyone to see.

Anyone else having trouble getting 4chan pol cbts # 3371 to show up on Google?😬😤😫

I’m curious. What’s to stop the deep state from rounding up all of their enemies this way?

Great post, @lawyer4justice. Thanks for your hard work and concise elucidation. In hopes you'll do more digging per the user requests in the Comments, I am going to sticky this post in place of the original QAnon sticky, and flair this "Share!".

Also, commend your effort to satisfy Rule 1. Appreciated. Might want to tweak the wording from "human trafficking" to "child trafficking" though. The same logic applies.

Trump had his press conference. No indictments revealed. Let me guess, he is waiting for the right moment to strike! 12 D chess!

And by art i'm talking about expensive fucking art worth 10,000's of thousands of hundreds of thousands of millions of billions of dollars not 8 dollar loli and hentai on patreon.

All art experts all art experts too this A.O now! All callsigns. Get the charges blow the door breach and clear gather all the art and intel you can now. blow the lid off pizzagate lets kill these human trafficking organ trafficking pedophile bastards now.

Voat! Recruit art experts to this site now we need art experts now. Find the best find some one now.

The art is the key to all of this. It's in the art.

Keep an eye on high end art it's sought after by pedophiles. Use the art to connect the dots and connect art to pedophiles. Pedophiles love art. We The Da Vinci Code and National Treasure now.

Truly truly excellent work on this - this is exactly what I was looking for when this first appeared in the research community. Thank you.

Sealed indictments: https: / / drive. google.com /file/ d/15579P4VztZO0aNvejJasb1yOvXUCp3vS/view

Thank you OP for putting this in terms my brain can actually comprehend. It's horrible, but the more we know the stronger we are. The truth will come out, eventually.

Awesome. Many thanks for this precious information!

Is it possible to get the indictment count for Hollywood? If that's where a great many of the closed indictments are it seems to make sense to get some historical context there.

While the indictments have increased, it is not as dramatic as it seems at further glance. Also, some courts tend to seal most cases initially until the Defendant appears, so it can be a tough category to read. Wanted to ensure accuracy to remove as much confirmation bias as possible.

Oh Oh Oh

ditto to Factfinder2 comment I wish I could upvoat more.
This fills in many blanks on this topic. Thanks so much!

Factfinder2 4 points (+4|-0) 1.1 hours ago Extremely interesting. Thank you for this.

Very interesting.

Just to confirm a theory, could you check the numbers for a few random years?

My theory is about the average number of sealed indictments per year. If it is correct, then 2006 should be a relatively average year, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that this number of 800+ is a major statistical anomoly, thus a big "something burger".

UV. Analysis of available facts rather than new info ...thats some good brainwork right there. And really encouraging for folks like me that are becoming impatient....Excellent post.

Well said. Excellent post

Don't click a google drive link you fucking morons

Upvoat for ya, @Lawyer4Justice. You did an excellent job explaining this, and you put it in words that mere mortals (i.e., non-lawyers) can understand. This is very helpful, especially in light of all the chatter about the "sealed indictments" that I've seen here, on 4chan/pol, and on Twitter. Great job. Thank you.

CNN is previewing a story now about the unusual push to seat new judges, even ones they claim are not qualified.

How many users does Voat have that are active?

Awesome research...you've answered many questions that I and I'm sure many people have about this whole part of the subject...Much love...

800+ in two weeks vs 200+ all year Assuming that the 832 number is correct

According to 8chan, it is now 1100.

Could this be why there is such an urgent push to begin an impeachment of Trump case?

Bless you. I was hoping someone could distill this. @ lawyer4justice - I'm not breaking OPSEC to sign up for PACER account. Search the same time frame for last year. There are lots of recurring operations in all facets of LE which occur at the same time every year. If you can get that info from PACER, I'd be curious to see what was filed in this same timeframe, in the same jurisdictions in 2016. Thanks.

Thank you!

Is this the correct docket? This is where I found George Webb Sweigert vs Podesta et:al I think.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rss_outside.pl

Thank you for explaining this putting it in perspective! I wonder when these will be unsealed.

What are the links to the court dockets? I had the link at one time, lost it, and could not find it again. I found the link to all the courts and then was not sure which court it was.

Thanks OP! Answers many questions I had about the sealed indictments. One "bonus" of the pizzagate investigation is that I have learned so many things during the last year - about law, art trade, the international monetary system and much more.

Thanks, very informative.

Extremely interesting. Thank you for this.