Q asked the questions on his latest drop: how do you catch a dangerous animal? Do you attack it from the front? Do you walk through the front door? Do you signal ahead before attacking? Lets hope its a front designed to let their guard down.
I agree. Trump would fire him if he wasn't doing exactly what he wanted him to do.....
Along those same lines, I am suspicious, if Sessions is truly in good standing with Trump, about WHY the GOP Congress is grilling him and demanding an investigation into Hillary/Uranium 1 that is likely being investigated already....
The conspiratorial view might be that the establishment types in Congress want to control any investigations into Hillary/Uranium 1 (remember the questions Trey Gowdy DIDN'T ask when Hillary was before Congress....He missed a huge opportunity to make several of her email/server felonies very clear).
What if the pressure on Sessions from Congress is in fact a demand to Trump to "show us your hand"? The establishment GOP would be as worried about what Trump has as the Democrats....
Perhaps Trump has reason to believe Uranium 1 indictments will be generated "accidentally" from the Mueller investigation, or similar, which would look a lot less like targeting political opponents than having his named DOJ Head establishing a special prosecutor to do it....
Given Session's history --and what he gave up to support Trump's candidacy-- I still have an easier time believing that Sessions is "taking one for the team" rather than all-of-a-sudden turning into a cuck. Can't criticize others, though, who have lost patience. Having plenty of difficulty maintaining patience, myself.
Oh completely agree, i am teetering on the edge of giving up myself, I try to word myself carefully so i am not misunderstood, there is alot of dissinformation around so i like to just give the information that i can without name calling, unless they are a blatant sex case/sympathiser then i lose my rag, but for wanting to believe i have no issue with that at all. Facts is what people should stick too to dismiss or validate. Not attacking someone. We're all guilty of being caught out by bullshit.
Yep. Key is to be able to say "I was wrong to believe that"....If you're capable giving up a belief when contrary evidence is presented (amazing how many can't do that), you can really build up a lot of knowledge from immersion in websites like this....Thanks
view the rest of the comments →
Terraeri1 ago
Q asked the questions on his latest drop: how do you catch a dangerous animal? Do you attack it from the front? Do you walk through the front door? Do you signal ahead before attacking? Lets hope its a front designed to let their guard down.
Hortance ago
I agree. Trump would fire him if he wasn't doing exactly what he wanted him to do..... Along those same lines, I am suspicious, if Sessions is truly in good standing with Trump, about WHY the GOP Congress is grilling him and demanding an investigation into Hillary/Uranium 1 that is likely being investigated already.... The conspiratorial view might be that the establishment types in Congress want to control any investigations into Hillary/Uranium 1 (remember the questions Trey Gowdy DIDN'T ask when Hillary was before Congress....He missed a huge opportunity to make several of her email/server felonies very clear).
What if the pressure on Sessions from Congress is in fact a demand to Trump to "show us your hand"? The establishment GOP would be as worried about what Trump has as the Democrats....
Perhaps Trump has reason to believe Uranium 1 indictments will be generated "accidentally" from the Mueller investigation, or similar, which would look a lot less like targeting political opponents than having his named DOJ Head establishing a special prosecutor to do it.... Given Session's history --and what he gave up to support Trump's candidacy-- I still have an easier time believing that Sessions is "taking one for the team" rather than all-of-a-sudden turning into a cuck. Can't criticize others, though, who have lost patience. Having plenty of difficulty maintaining patience, myself.
Terraeri1 ago
Oh completely agree, i am teetering on the edge of giving up myself, I try to word myself carefully so i am not misunderstood, there is alot of dissinformation around so i like to just give the information that i can without name calling, unless they are a blatant sex case/sympathiser then i lose my rag, but for wanting to believe i have no issue with that at all. Facts is what people should stick too to dismiss or validate. Not attacking someone. We're all guilty of being caught out by bullshit.
Hortance ago
Yep. Key is to be able to say "I was wrong to believe that"....If you're capable giving up a belief when contrary evidence is presented (amazing how many can't do that), you can really build up a lot of knowledge from immersion in websites like this....Thanks