Donald Trump Jr releases private messages between him and Wikileaks
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-jr-releases-private-002700793.html
Donald Trump Jr has released his private messages with Wikileaks, after an explosive report revealed he was in communication with Julian Assange's organisation during his father's 2016 election campaign.
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/930228239494209536?s=17
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOmEuiuXUAAgtrM.jpg
http://i.imgs.fyi/img/1uyh.jpg
Julian Assange response
http://i.imgs.fyi/img/1uyq.jpg
Another tweet from Assange from last month showing that Diane Feinstein was demanding his personal twitter direct messages. https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/924003409052819456?s=17
Senator Dianne Feinstein demands @jack hand over @WikiLeaks and my personal Twitter Direct Messages. Feinstein has been calling for my prosecution since 2010 over our publications.
http://wlsearch.tk/
https://files.catbox.moe/tewqhg.png
Note: @Hug-a-Root noticed that the clock on the webpage is set to 11:09. Could that mean November 9th? @Argosciv said that Vault 8 was released on Nov 9.
You finally found me! I'm the source of the John Podesta/DNC Email hacks. I've been waiting so long for you to join me.
Thanks to Wikileaks and Trump Jr you'll all soon know why Hillary Clinton and John Podesta had me killed.
This relates to pizzagate because Wikileaks helped lead us to discovering it!
Edit:
@fartyshorts says you can tell it was changed between October and on November 14 ,
most likely towards the latter
https://archive.fo/http://wlsearch.tk/
It's on a free domain name (.tk). You can see it was available the same day: https://archive.fo/6I395
Then it was converted in to the "truther" site - a whopping 24 minutes later. https://archive.fo/LWMNE
Although: Maybe it was all planned?
Edit: Trump Jr made a tweet on October 14, 2016 with a link to that very same website... https://imgoat.com/uploads/6f041e16a6/57709.jpeg
Could all of this be a plan where there is plausible deniability?
Someone made this tweet... https://mobile.twitter.com/LyndaAvanzato/status/930334664434356224?s=17
Now it all makes sense. Julian Assange set the site up to dump the information that corresponds with the codes he gave out a few weeks earlier. He knew Trump was still in play with the arrest he was ordering over here and his overseas trip. So the site is ready for him.
Could that be the case? Time will tell.
Edit: Going back to what fartyshorts said (I posted above). The archive shows a change that happened recently. Interestingly, there could be a reason why it has changed.
Read this article from CNN
talks about the .tk domain creations and what happens when idle. It gets parked and will show ads. It wasn't for sale. It said disabled.
Freedom Registry makes money through ads on expired domains. Zuurbier says registration and renewal are free for users, but when they abandon the site or don't meet the minimum requirements of 25 unique visitors every 90 days, the domain gets "parked." That means the URL still exists, but the content is replaced with ads tailored to the original site.
"If your website was about your trip to Mexico, we have spiders that go through all of the live websites, and the moment the live website expires, we take the domain name back," Zuurbier said. "We then put ads on there that are relevant to the content that was there before. In this case, your trip to Mexico."
Edit: Ed from The Outer Light made a video about this...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=mYfUHYFYC3g
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
Except that was not the content of that page when Assange DMed him.
Also, this is your big takeaway from this news?
OldGoatNewCoat ago
Who said wikileaks was neutral and unbiased? I've only seen the claim that they're reliable and accurate, never that they had no motives of their own.
LionElTrump ago
Who says they are not neutral and unbiased? Only the people accused of course!
OldGoatNewCoat ago
I'm not accused and I'll say they're biased/non-neutral. The timing of leaks is considered, and Assange doesn't want to live in an embassy until he rots.
It's just a false dichotomy, it's entirely possible for the organization to be biased and push a self-serving agenda (Assange wants safe haven somewhere), while also serving the good of the many.
It's actually very similar to the false dichotomy around Trump: I've heard a lot of people suggest that he only ran for the presidency because of his ego as though that is necessarily a bad thing. But I feel that if he ran for his ego, that's reassuring, because his ego would take a massive hit if he went down in history as a failed president. Whereas if he goes down in history as "the man who saved america", his ego will be thrilled.
Sometimes, what is good for the individual is also good for the many.
bopper ago
Exactly, about Trump. False dichotomy. Why can't both be correct. I think you said it well. Congrats, you are thinking. This is something that would be helpful to many if they could refrain from just thinking either / or. It's not that simple w/ the man and his agenda.
OldGoatNewCoat ago
As far as Trump goes, I accept that I only have access to the least important information: What happens in the public sphere. What goes on behind closed doors is anybody's guess, and mine is about as good as anyone else's, so I don't bother dwelling on what my guess is precisely.
Belief is a powerful thing, strong enough to turn ordinary men into living gods (pharaohs), if those men truly lack any spark/touch of the divine, that merely lends more credence to the sheer power of belief. In my mind, whether humans drive belief or belief drives human behavior is a foolish question, it's asking which part of the wheel drives itself.
The man's antics make me laugh in the face of darkness, and I think that's one of the strongest factors of belief there is: Danger, darkness and despair are all a part of this world, but their strongest power is that which we give them, so why give them anything but laughter? Why cower in fear at terrorists when instead you can call them gullible losers? The act has already been done, you're not going to deradicalize them from suburbia, so just laugh at the losers duped by the forces of evil. You'd have to be a dummy to work for evil!
It's honestly great. Words are so lacking for the light that has been put into my heart over the course of the last year. Who could have imagined a world where all it took to show me the beauty of God's creation was Donald-Fucking-Trump being elected President of the USA? The gods gave us this world to laugh and love in, and isn't Donald-Fucking-Trump as POTUS all the evidence we need of that fact?
bopper ago
Nice. And to think there's more to come. There is, trust me. (Don't mean to sound condescending. But keep a very, very open mind. Big things are coming. It will be traumatizing for normies, and a spiritual awakening for many ... anon, whether legit or not, mentioned The Great Awakening ... that was an historical event.)
Really like your comments.