https://wikispooks.com/w/images/7/72/Tranceformation_america.pdf
Book: "Trance Formation of America" by Cathy O'Brien
From Chapter 15 titled “No More Beating Around the Bush:
“Bush was wearing canvas boat shoes and a cardigan sweater as he knelt on one knee in front of Kelly in order to talk to her on her level. Bush used the children's television program Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood to scramble/confuse young victims' (like Kelly's) memory of contact with him and his sexual abuse. His physical resemblance to TV's Fred Rogers was deliberately exaggerated by his choice of clothes and mannerisms, and is further compounded by his developed vocal impersonation. Using his best Mr. Rogers voice he said, "Come here, Little One. I want to ask you something. Do you watch Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood?"
"Yes, Sir," Kelly responded.
Bush told Kelly, "Well, I'm kind of like Mr. Rogers when he makes his puppets move and talk—like your daddy (Houston, ventriloquist) does with Elmer (his dummy). Only I'm like Mr. Rogers because I have lots of puppets—only mine are people. I even have a King (Fahd) just like Mr. Rogers. I pull the strings (he pantomimed marionette hand movements) and I talk through them. They say my words and we create all kinds of exciting Adventures. Right now I'm building a new Neighborhood (the New World Order). The stage is set, and I have hold of everyone's strings. I need you to help me— together we can pull your mother's strings. She's in my Neighborhood. That means you're in my Neighborhood, too."
It seems obvious to me now that Bush was referring to those actively engaged in implementing the New World Order through chaos and mass mind control (aka media conditioning) as "The Neighborhood". Of course I was unable to consider disputing Bush's statement, and Kelly was certainly not of a mind to see beyond Bush's twist on her favorite television program. Kelly's big blue eyes grew even wider as she responded, "I am?"
Bush stood up and took her hand, "C'mon. Let me show you my Neighborhood," He led her out the door.
Kelly became violently physically ill after her induction into George Bush's "Neighborhood," and from every sexual encounter she had with him thereafter. She ran 104-6 degree temperatures, vomited and endured immobilizing headaches for an average of three days (as is consistent with high voltage trauma). These were the only tell-tale evidences aside from the scarring burns left on her skin. Houston forbade me to call a doctor, and Kelly forbade me to comfort her, pitifully complaining that her head "hurt too bad to even move". And she did not move for hours on end. Kelly often complained of severe kidney pain, and her rectum usually bled for a day or two after Bush sexually abused her. My own mind-control victimization rendered me unable to help or protect her. Seeing my child in such horrible condition drove my own wedge of insanity in deeper, perpetuating my total inability to affect her needs until our rescue by Mark Phillips in 1988.
Kelly's bleeding rectum was but one of many physical indicators of George Bush's pedophile perversions; I have overheard him speak blatantly of his sexual abuse of her on many occasions. He used this and threats to her life to "pull my strings" and control me.”
view the rest of the comments →
cutelobster ago
There are some doubts about the Cathy O'Brien story. Ed Opperman did an interview with her and her 'rescuer', Mark Phillips, which made them sound untrustworthy. The background story is sketchy e.g. Phillips was supposedly a CIA guy who rescued O'Brien, then wrote a book about it whilst they went around the world promoting it. How many ex-CIA guys become famous for denouncing the agency, go on speaking-tours, and live to tell the tale? From what I've read e.g. Rense article Phillips is a 'mis-directer', pointing you away from the real pedos and towards people who aren't pedos at all. The O'Brien-Phillips collaboration seems to be another example of a limited hangout. Very probably the story contains real elements, but also very likely contains substantial falsity.
Factfinder2 ago
Thanks for the Rense article link. I have read it before and seen many other accounts questioning Mark Phillips' true mission. Of course at this point we have no way to be certain of the facts, but I also question Phillips' role. O'Brien's story definitely could be distorted under his influence, but to me it seems likely that at least some of it is true. And yes, disclosing truth mixed with untruths is the definition of a limited hangout.
The many points of correlation between O'Brien's story and Brice Taylor's are difficult to dismiss, though, and I find both women very believable in video testimony. It is true, though, that this could just mean that THEY believe their stories, not necessarily that the stories are actually true as opposed to implanted memories.
Another potentially questionable figure in all this, in my opinion, is former FBI "whistleblower" Ted Gunderson, who championed Brice Taylor in particular. http://educate-yourself.org/tg/index.shtml
So many unanswerable questions at this point.