Judge Roy Moore: Will Sue WaPo Over Hiit Pieces (pizzagate)

submitted ago by migratorypatterns

Judge Roy Moore announced that he plans on suing WaPo over the hit pieces. Summarization: After they ran fake articles on him taking a one million dollar salary from his foundation, and after it was proven to be untrue, they then ran the articles of alleged sexual misconduct with minors.

If he does follow through, this will be the biggest tell that he's telling the truth. NOBODY wants to go to court ... NOBODY. Especially go up against a faux media giant with deep pockets. It means the reporter will have to testify in court though. And so will his women accusers. IF there is that tape of bribery out there, it can be introduced as evidence. I'm thinking there has to be some pretty strong evidence for him to go this route. Usually, you just talk your stance out in the press.

He's a judge and he should know what the hell proof of collusion, etc. there is. Hopefully, there'll be enough evidence and WaPo will suffer another black eye. And he should be able to collect some hefty damages which will be nice.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/12/exclusive-judge-roy-moore-announces-plans-sue-washington-post/

“Shortly after becoming the Republican nominee for the United States Senate, the Washington Post published an article attacking me, my wife, my Foundation for Moral Law in Montgomery, Alabama, on my salary,” Moore announced to a crowd of about 100 supporters at the Huntsville Christian Academy:

They said I took over a million dollars. There were not a million dollars. I wish I had a million dollars. In fact, I didn’t take the money they awarded me for a salary because I had my own recognition and opted to embrace that salary myself and not take anything from the foundation. So my salary collection wasn’t so much. Over eight years it would have been about $87,000 a year—so I had to take a note and a mortgage for the rest of it. But I never got the money. So, the Washington Post finally realized this after they published an article saying my wife and I got a million dollars, saying, “you didn’t pay taxes for what you didn’t get.”

The audience laughed before Moore continued.

“So I was wondering where they got that idea—they talked about control of the money, we didn’t have control of the money,” Moore said. “Anyway, to make a long story short, they kind of failed. So about 30 days before the general election, just the other day, the Washington Post published another attack on my character and reputation because they are desperate to stop my political campaign. These attacks said I was with a minor child and are false and untrue—and for which they will be sued.”

It's so funny, but that stupid salary item was what some crazy shill kept posting -- spamming my threads with that nonsense even after it's proven to be fake news!

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

No he won't. He will threaten to sue and then not sue. There's no way Roy Moore actually files this lawsuit.

They did not say he took a million dollar salary. They said his salary was was 180K per year and he received $1 million dollars in total compensation. This is what the article said.

But privately, Moore had arranged to receive a salary of $180,000 a year for part-time work at the Foundation for Moral Law, internal charity documents show. He collected more than $1 million as president from 2007 to 2012, compensation that far surpassed what the group disclosed in its public tax filings most of those years. When the charity couldn’t afford the full amount, Moore in 2012 was given a promissory note for back pay eventually worth $540,000 or an equal stake of the charity’s most valuable asset, a historic building in Montgomery, Ala., mortgage records show. He holds that note even now, a charity official said.

As for fake news the Washington Post quoted five tax experts and the campaign declined to give them a comment ](http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/10/washington_post_stands_by_repo.html))

A Post spokeswoman told AL.com that the paper would not be issuing any corrections because its reporting is solid, adding that the campaign declined to comment when contacted by the Post. "We stand by our reporting on the compensation Judge Roy Moore has received from the Foundation for Moral Law. On Oct. 11, we reported that his compensation -- in excess of $1 million -- included a promissory note currently valued at $540,000. A story published Oct. 20 reported that the foundation did not disclose on income reports to the IRS that it had given Moore the promissory note as a guarantee of payment, according to the charity's own documents. Five tax law and accounting specialists told The Washington Post that it appears the guaranteed payment should have been reported as compensation, in part because it could be cashed in on demand," said Kristine Coratti Kelly in an email. "Moore and his campaign have declined to answer The Post's questions about these matters."