We all know the New York Times just reported that both John and Tony Podesta have been swooped up as part of Mueller's ongoing Russia investigation.
Interestingly enough, even if it was a fluff piece to prop them up or try to secure some public sympothy for their suffering now, the article went out of its way to include a comment and link to the infamous ARTWORK.
Tony Podesta moved into a 7,000-square-foot house in Washington’s exclusive Kalorama neighborhood, which he had bought for $3.9 million in addition to his homes in Australia and Venice. After three years of renovations, he turned it into a fund-raising hot spot with a modern art collection and a wine cellar with thousands of bottles.
Why is that important? The linked article is old, June 2015, but here is the very FIRST SENTENCE:
If you've ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and glass of win in hand, you need to befriend superlobbyist Tony Podesta.
Later on in the same article, whose name should appear?
Currently he has collected from 40 different artists in some depth, with his top five being Marina Abramovic, Vik Muniz, Bourgeois, Olafur Eliasson and Antony Gormley.
Old news, right? Or maybe it's intended to remind us all that Podesta and Pizza are now forever inextricable.
view the rest of the comments →
migratorypatterns ago
And maybe it's a way to enlist other "pizza" lovers. You know, like a hand signal telling other freemasons you're a brethren. You know, we've discussed these "modern art collections" as nothing more than hideous ways to launder money. So t could be a "Hey, our fellow pizza lover needs money, so any rich pedophiles out there, be sure to give by pretending to buy a painting!!!
Are_we__sure ago
Which is far from showing this is true.
pizzaequalspedo ago
Wrong. No one in their right mind would pay tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars for that garbage.
Are_we_sure ago
Nonsense